Page 79 - ACCCN's Critical Care Nursing

56 S C O P E O F C R I T I C A L C A R E

92. Coleman RW. Translation and interpretation: the hidden processes and 120. McDonough JE. Proactive hazard analysis and health care policy. New York:
problems revealed by computerized physician order entry systems. J Crit Care Milbank Memorial Fund; 2002.
2004; 19(4): 279–82. 121. Sorro JS, Nieva VF. Hospital survey on patient safety culture. Rockville, MD:
93. Tooey MJ, Mayo A. Handheld technologies in a clinical setting: state of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
technology and resources. AACN Clin Issues 2003; 14: 342–9. 122. Davies HT, Nutley SM, Mannion R. Organisational culture and quality of
94. Craig AE. PDAs and smartphones: clinical tools for nurses. Medscape Business health care. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 111–19.
of Medicine [serial on the Internet] 2009. Available from: www.medscape.com. 123. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K et al. The Safety
95. Lapinsky S, Wax R, Showater R, Martinez-Motta JC, Hallett DC et al. Prospec- Attitudes Questionniare: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and
tive evaluation of an internet-linked handheld computer critical care knowl- emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6(44): 1472–82.
edge access system. Crit Care 2004; 8: R414–21. 124. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork
96. George LE, Davidson LJ, Serapiglia CP, Barla S, Thotakura A. Technology in among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 2003; 31(3):
nursing education: A study of PDA use by students. J Prof Nurs 2010; 26(6): 956–9.
371–6. 125. Huang DT, Clermont G, Sexton JB, Karlo CA, Miller RG et al. Perceptions of
97. Kuiper RA. Metacognitive factors that impact student nurse use of point of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution. Crit
care technology in clinical settings. Int J Nurs Educ Schol 2010; 7(1): 1–15. Care Med 2007; 35(1): 165–76.
98. Martinez-Motta JC, Walker RG, Stewart TE, Granton J, Abrahamson S, 126. Clarke JR, Lerner JC, Marella W. The role for leaders of health care organiza-
Lapinsky SE. Critical care procedure logging using handheld computers. tions in patient safety. Am J Med Qual 2007; 22(5): 311–18.
Crit Care 2004; 8(5): R336–42. 127. Reader T, Flinn R, Lauche K, Cuthbertson BH. Non-technical skills in the
99. Bochicchio GV, Smit PA, Moore R, Bochicchio K, Auwaerter P et al. Pilot intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96(5): 551–9.
study of a web-based antibiotic decision management guide. J Am Coll Surg 128. Clancy CM, Tornberg DN. TeamSTEPPS: Assuring optimal teamwork in clini-
2006;202 (3): 459–67. cal settings. Am J Med Qual 2007; 22: 214–17.
100. Iregui M, Ward S, Clinikscale D, Clayton D, Kollef MH. Use of a handheld 129. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National
computer by respiratory care practitioners to improve the efficiency of Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Recognising and Responding to Clini-
weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2002; 30(9): cal Deterioration. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2010.
2038–43. 130. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Acutely Ill Patients in
101. Rosenfeld B, Dorman T, Breslow M, Pronovost PJ, Jenckes MW et al. Intensive Hospital: Recognition of and Response to Acute Illness in Adults in Hospital.
care unit telemedicine: alternate paradigm for providing continuous inten- London: Author; 2007.
sivist care. Crit Care Med 2000; 28(12): 3925–31. 131. DeVita MA, Braithwaite RS, Mahidhara R, Stuart S, Foraida M et al. Use of
102. Afessa B. Tele-intensive care unit: the horse out of the barn. Crit Care Med medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary
[Editorial] 2010; 38(1): 292–3. arrests. Qual Safe Health Care 2004; 13: 251–4.
103. Breslow M, Rosenfeld B, Doerfler M, Burke G, Yates G et al. Effect of a 132. McArthur-Rouse F. Critical care outreach services and early warning scoring
multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and eco- systems: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2001; 36: 696–704.
nomic outcomes: An alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing. Crit Care 133. Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K. The medical emergency team.
Med 2004; 32(1): 31–8. Anaesth Intens Care 1995; 23: 183–6.
104. Vespa PM, Miller C, Hu X, Nenov V, Buxey F, Martin NA. Intensive care unit 134. Morgan RJM, Williams F, Wright MM. An early warning scoring system for
robotic telepresence facilitates rapid physician response to unstable patients detecting developing critical illness. Clin Intens Care 1997; 8: 100.
and decreased cost in neurointensive care. Surg Neurol 2006; 67(2007): 135. Goldhill DR, Worthington L, Mulcahy A, Tarling M, Sumner A. The patient
331–7. at risk team: identifying and managing seriously ill ward patients. Anesth
105. Westbrook J, Coiera EW, Brear M, Stapleton S, Rob M et al. Impact of an 1999; 55: 853–60.
ultrabroadband emergency department telemedicine system on the care of 136. Goldhill DR, McNarry AF, Mandersloot G, McGinley A. A physiologically-
acutely ill patients and clinicians’ work. Med J Aust [Research] 2008; 188(12): based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score
704–8. and outcomes. Anesth 2005; 60: 547–53.
106. Thomas EJ, Lucke JF, Wueste L, Weavind L, Patel B. Association of telemedi- 137. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, Buckmaster J, Hart GK et al. A prospec-
cine for remote monitoring of intesive care patients with mortality, compli- tive before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team. Med J Aust 2003;
cations, and length of stay. J Am Med Assoc 2009; 302(24): 2671–8. 179: 283–7.
107. Morrison JL, Cai Q, Davis N, Yan Y, Berbaum ML et al. Clinical and economic 138. Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolas I, Payne S, Castle N. The indentifica-
outcomes of the electronic intensive care unit: results from two community tion of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to
hospitals. Crit Care Med 2010; 38(1): 2–8. alert a medical emergency team. Resusc 2002; 54: 125–31.
108. Yoo JS, Dudley RA. Evaluating telemedicine in the ICU. J Am Med Assoc 2009; 139. Buist MD, Moore GE, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson JN, Nguyen TV.
302(24): 2705–6. Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mor-
109. Curran VR. Tele-education. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12(2): 57–63. tality from unexpected cardiac arrests in a hospital: a preliminary study. BMJ
110. Simpson RL. See the future of distance education. Nurs Manage 2006; 37(2): 2002; 324: 387–90.
42, 44, 46–51. 140. UK NHS Modernisation Agency. The National Outreach Report. London: UK
111. Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Boucque H, Van Maele G, Defloor T. Pressure Department of Health; 2003.
ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students. 141. Chaboyer W, James H, Kendall M. Transitional care after the intensive
J Clin Nurs 2008; 17(13): 1697–707. care unit: current trends and future directions. Crit Care Nurs 2005; 25:
112. Maag M. The potential use of “blogs” in nursing education. Comput Inform 1–10.
Nurs 2005; 23(1): 16–24. 142. Chaboyer W, Foster MM, Foster M, Kendall E. The intensive care unit liaison
113. Kreideweis J. Indicators of success in distance education. Comput Inform Nurs nurse: towards a clear role description. Intens Crit Care Nurs 2004; 20:
2005; 23(2): 68–72. 77–86.
114. Moreno RP, Rhodes A, Donchin Y. Patient safety in intensive care medicine: 143. Russell S. Reducing readmissions to the intensive care unit: employment of
The Declaration of Vienna. Intens Care Med 2009; 35: 1667–72. a follow-up nurse. Heart & Lung 1999; 28: 365–72.
115. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 144. Hillman K, Chen J, Cretikos M, Bellomo R, Brown D et al. Introduction of
21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled
116. Institute of Medicine. Patient safety: Achieving a new standard of care. trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 2091–7.
Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2003. 145. Bristow PJ, Hillman KM, Chey T, Daffum K, Jacques T. Rates of in-hospital
117. European Agency Safety Improvement for Patients in Europe (SIMPATIE). arrests, deaths and critical care admissions: the effect of the medical emer-
Cited 1 February 2010. Available from: http://www.simpatie.org. gency team. Med J Aust 2000; 173: 236–50.
118. Bagian JP, Gosbee J, Lee CZ, Williams L, McKnight SD, Mannos DM. The 146. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S. Prospective controlled trial of effect of
Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action. Jt Comm J Qual Improv medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.
2002; 28: 531–45. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 916–21.
119. Middleton S, Walker C, Chester R. Implementing root cause analysis in an 147. Dacey MJ, Mirza ER, Wilcox V, Doherty M, Mello J et al. The effect of a rapid
area health service: views of the participants. Aust Health Rev 2005; 29: response team on major clinical outcome measures in a community hospi-
422–8. tal. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(9): 2076–82.