Page 1200 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1200

1048   Part VII  Hematologic Malignancies


        Retrospective Comparison of Pediatric and             extends well into the middle years of adult life. In the French Acute
                                                                                                                −
        Adult Cooperative Group Trials in Adolescents         Lymphoblastic Leukemia Pediatric group (FRALLE) study, 28 Ph
                                                              adult  ALL  patients  16–57  years  old  were  treated  on  the  FRALLE
        and Young Adults                                      2000 protocol consisting of a prednisone prophase, four-drug induc-
                                                              tion including L-asparaginase, consolidation, delayed intensification,
        The  retrospective  comparisons  summarized  in  Table  66.10  were   and maintenance chemotherapy. Four-year DFS was 90% versus 47%
        performed  by  large  cooperative  groups  throughout  the  world  and   seen in matched historical control participants. In the GRAALL 2003
                                                                        −
        examined the outcome of the AYA patients aged 15–21 years treated   study, 225 Ph  ALL patients 15–60 years old (median: 31 years) were
        on pediatric or adult cooperative group trials for newly diagnosed   treated  between  2003  and  2005  with  five-drug  induction,  dose-
        ALL that were conducted contemporaneously. The majority of these   intense consolidation, delayed intensification, and 2-year maintenance
        retrospective comparison studies demonstrated a significant survival   therapy. Notably, aSCT for patients younger than 55 years was rec-
        advantage for AYA patients treated by the pediatric versus the adult   ommended in this trial and makes interpretation of this trial more
        cooperative  group. The  first  of  these  trials  to  have  been  reported   problematic. The CR rate was 93.5%. Among the 139 CR patients,
        highlights many of the interesting questions posed by these compari-  71 actually underwent transplantation in CR1 and were censored at
        sons and is reviewed briefly here. The CALGB and the Children’s   the time of transplant. At 42 months, EFS was 55% versus 41% when
        Cancer Group (CCG) examined the outcome of 321 AYA patients   comparing patients from an earlier French trial, the LALA-94, and
        between 16 and 20 years of age treated on consecutive trials from   the OS was 61%, significantly better than the 41% OS observed in
        1988 to 2001. The two patient groups were well matched for biologic   the LALA-94 trial (p < .001). The benefit of the GRAALL approach
        features,  including  immunophenotype  and  cytogenetics.  Although   was not statistically significant in patients older than 45 years of age
        the age range was the same in both groups examined, the median age   because  of  a  significant  increase  in  treatment-related  mortality  of
        of the patients in the CALGB studies was 19 years compared with   23%  compared  with  5%  treatment-related  mortality  for  patients
        16 years for the CCG patients. CR rates were identical—90% for   younger than 45 years old. The investigators concluded that the use
        both CALGB and CCG AYAs. However, CCG AYAs had a 63% EFS   of a pediatric-inspired regimen in adults up to 45 years of age was
        at 7 years and 67% OS at 7 years in contrast to the CALGB AYAs,   tolerable and markedly improved outcome for “younger” adults with
        in which the 7-year EFS was only 34%. A difference in pattern of   ALL. This regimen included older adults up to the age of 60 years
        relapse was also noted. The incidence of CNS relapses was signifi-  and used only a modified pediatric regimen that did not use the dose
        cantly higher in CALGB AYAs (11%) compared with the CCG AYAs   intensity  of  corticosteroids,  asparaginase,  and  vincristine  that  are
        (1.4%; p < .001).                                     routinely used in current pediatric regimens. Another difference from
           Since the initial report of these findings in 2000, multiple national   the pediatric regimens is that all patients in these trials still received
        European  cooperative  groups  have  reported  similar  results  with   prophylactic cranial irradiation. Also, the majority of CR1 patients
        improvement in the outcome of AYAs treated on pediatric compared   actually underwent aSCT, which is not the approach used by pediatric
        with  adult  protocols,  and  these  are  summarized  in  Table  66.10.   groups. Thus any interpretation of the contribution of the “chemo-
        Although the treatment approaches differ among countries, several   therapy”  intensification  component  of  these  trials  to  DFS  is  very
        treatment themes have emerged as being potentially important. Pedi-  difficult to assess.
        atric studies throughout the world use considerably more treatment   The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) consortium has also
        with  nonmyelosuppressive  drugs,  including  glucocorticoids  (both   extended  its  successful  pediatric  regimen  to  older  patients  18–50
        dexamethasone  and  prednisone),  vincristine,  and  L-asparaginase.   years old. The trial design here was a true pediatric approach with
        CNS  prophylaxis  is  typically  administered  earlier,  with  a  greater   intensification of Escherichia coli L-asparaginase, glucocorticoids, and
        frequency, and for a more prolonged period during pediatric group   vincristine for patients up to 50 years old; aSCT was not routinely
        trials.  Finally,  long-term  maintenance  therapy  was  also  continued   recommended. A total of 92 patients, with a median age of 28 years
        for a longer period in pediatric cooperative group trials. Based on   (range:  18–50  years)  were  evaluable.  Seventy  nine  patients  (85%)
        additional  retrospective  data  from  Finland  and  the  MD  Anderson   achieved a CR after 1 month of intensive induction therapy. With a
        Cancer Center, it appears that treating patients in a uniform fashion   median  follow-up  time  of  4.5  years,  the  4-year  DFS  rate  for  all
        by  an  experienced  group  of  physicians  and  nurses  is  also  a  very   patients was 69% and the OS rate 67%. For the 74 patients with
                                                                –
        important  component  in  the  successful  treatment  of  young  adults     Ph  ALL, DFS was 71%, and OS was 70%.
        with ALL.                                                The largest prospective trial to evaluate the feasibility of using a
           To  begin  to  address  the  many  unanswered  questions  that  have   pediatric regimen in AYA patients treated by adult medical hematolo-
        been raised by the retrospective comparison trials and to determine   gists and oncologists is ongoing in North America (CALGB-10403).
        whether AYA patients treated by adult hematologists and oncologists   The United States adult and pediatric cooperative groups are cur-
        can achieve similarly improved outcomes to the pediatricians for this   rently enrolling a total of 300 young adults aged between16 and 39
        age group, prospective cooperative group trials are being conducted   years on a prospective phase II trial (CALGB-10403) that uses one
        in North America and in Europe. Early results from several of these   treatment  arm  of  a  successful  Children’s  Oncology  Group  (COG)
        trials have recently been reported. The PETHEMA Protocol ALL-96   protocol for adolescents (and HR children with ALL). Early results
        addressed the toxicity and results of a pediatric-based protocol in 35   from this trial also suggest both the feasibility of use of an intensive
        adolescent (age: 15–18 years) and 46 young adults (age: 19–30 years)   pediatric regimen in young adults and significant improvement in
        with  SR  ALL.  In  this  trial,  patients  received  a  standard  five-drug,   EFS  of  66%  and  OS  of  79%  compared  with  historical  controls.
        5-week induction course followed by two cycles of early consolida-  Longer  follow-up  is  required  to  substantiate  these  promising  early
        tion, maintenance with monthly reinforcement cycles for 1 year after   results.
        remission, and standard maintenance chemotherapy for up to 2 years   These prospective trials are demonstrating that it is possible to
        after CR. The AYAs were well matched for pretreatment characteris-  achieve  significant  improvements  in outcome  for  AYAs with  ALL,
        tics. The CR rate was 98%, and with a median follow-up of 4.2 years,   although many challenges remain to ensure access to care, to mini-
        the 6-year EFS and OS were 61% and 69%, respectively. The only   mize treatment toxicity, and to develop and follow specific survivor-
        significant  predictor  of  poor  EFS  for  the  entire  group  was  a  slow   ship monitoring plans. As stated previously, the successful outcome
        response to initial induction therapy (>10% blasts remaining in BM   of a patient with ALL is, largely, based on the ability of both the
        aspirate done on day 14 of induction therapy). Thus the investigators   medical team and the patient to adhere to the rigorous and lengthy
        concluded that a pediatric regimen was tolerable and efficacious in   regimens that currently remain the gold standard of care. The next
        AYAs with ALL up to the age of 30 years.              generation of studies, linked to important biologic, psychosocial, and
           Two pilot studies from French adult cooperative groups have also   pharmacologic correlates, will result in further insights into optimiz-
        demonstrated  the  feasibility  of  using  modified  pediatric-inspired   ing the comprehensive approach to treatment and follow-up for this
        regimens  in  adults  with  ALL,  but  the  age  range  of  these  studies   significant group of patients with ALL, and may be the next step to
   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205