Page 1491 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1491

1326   Part VII  Hematologic Malignancies

                                                                                                             86
        higher  lymphoma  cure  rates  but  were  associated  with  less   survival based on the intensity of the chemotherapy regimen.  In
                                                                                    +
        chemotherapy-related  morbidity  and  mortality.  However,  with  the   patients  with  very  low  CD4   counts,  low-dose  chemotherapy  is  a
        evolution of supportive care, including PJP prophylaxis and neutro-  reasonable  treatment  option,  while  maintaining  the  possibility  of
        phil  growth  factors,  tolerance  of  chemotherapy  improved.  With   long-term  disease-free  survival  in  some.  In  a  recent  uncontrolled
        effective  antiretroviral  therapy,  long-term  outcomes  improved  as   prospective study where HIV-positive patients with BL were given
        well. 84,85  With full-dose therapies, some evidence emerged to suggest   a  shortened  course  of  EPOCH  with  a  double  dose  of  rituximab
        that stage-for-stage outcomes might be as good or better in patients   (SC-EPOCH-RR),  freedom  from  progression  and  overall  survival
                                                         86
        with HIV-associated lymphoma compared with those without HIV.    outcomes  were  favorable  and  comparable  to  those  seen  in  HIV-
        At the outset of therapy, a series of questions related to the chemo-  negative  patients  treated  with  the  standard  DA-EPOCH-R,  with
        therapy  regimen,  dose,  concomitant  HAART,  and  supportive  care   less  toxicity  and  lower  cumulative  doses  of  chemotherapy  in  the
        must be addressed.                                    SC-EPOCH-RR group. 93

        Regimen                                               Antiretroviral Therapy

        There  is  general  agreement  that  the  inclusion  of  rituximab  with   A few key special issues in considering concurrent antiretroviral and
        multiagent  chemotherapy  improves  outcome,  at  least  in  patients    lymphoma therapy include concerns about shared toxicities, drug–
                +
                                            3
        with CD4  counts of greater than 50 cells/mm . Rituximab, cyclo-  drug interactions, and risk for inability to comply with consistent
        phosphamide,  hydroxydaunomycin,  vincristine,  and  prednisone   antiretroviral dosing. Zidovudine is myelosuppressive and can exac-
        (R-CHOP)  and  dose-adjusted,  infusional  etoposide,  prednisone,   erbate pancytopenia associated with lymphoma therapy. If patients
        vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and hydroxydaunomycin with ritux-  are already on a zidovudine-containing regimen, it is generally pos-
        imab (DA-EPOCH-R) have emerged as standard regimens. 87,88  As in   sible  to  substitute  an  alternative  regimen  before  the  initiation  of
        the  treatment  of  DLBCL,  in  patients  without  HIV  infection,  the   lymphoma therapy. Many antiretroviral agents alter the metabolism
        value  of  infusional  chemotherapy  remains  controversial.  A  pooled   of  drugs  used  in  lymphoma  treatment. This  has  been  a  particular
                                                 89
        retrospective  analysis  favored  the  infusional  regimen.   However,   concern when infusional chemotherapy regimens are used, and some
        insofar as the trials were conducted sequentially (R-CHOP between   investigators have chosen to stop chemotherapy before initiation of
                                                                         84
        1998 and 2002, and R-EPOCH between 2002 and 2006), it is dif-  such regimens.  However, in trials involving infusional chemotherapy
        ficult to exclude other factors, such as the availability of better anti-  that  allowed  patients  already  on  a  stable  antiretroviral  regimen  to
        retroviral agents, improvements in supportive care, or changes in the   remain on that regimen during lymphoma treatment, major problems
                                                                          88
        population studied.                                   were not noted.  Nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy
           BL  typically  requires  more  intensive  treatment  regimens  than   regimens  may  interfere  with  regular  antiviral  dosing.  Intermittent
                          90
        those used for DLBCL.  Thus there has been concern about using   antiretroviral  therapy  raises  concerns  about  the  development  of  a
        these regimens in the HIV-seropositive population. A small retrospec-  resistant  strain  of  HIV.  Because  of  the  concern  that  initiation  of
        tive study of cyclophosphamide, vincristine (Oncovin), doxorubicin,   antiretroviral therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy might result in
        and methotrexate (CODOX-M)/ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytara-  such resistance, many recommend delaying initiation of antiretroviral
        bine  (IVAC)  for  BL  that  included  14  patients  with  HIV  showed   therapy until an appropriate regimen to control nausea and vomiting
        HIV-seropositive  patients  to  have  similar  progression-free  survival,   is established. Stopping antiretroviral therapy also carries with it some
        overall survival, and complete response rates as compared with the   risks. When antiretroviral therapy includes drugs with different half-
        HIV-negative patients with BL. In a multicenter retrospective study,   lives, stopping treatment may result in the longest-lived agent being
        HIV-positive  patients  with  BL  treated  with  rituximab  plus   present in the absence of other antiretroviral agents. This is particu-
        CODOX-M/IVAC had better progression-free and overall survival   larly  an  issue  for  long-lived  nonnucleoside  reverse  transcriptase
        with no increase in toxicity as compared with HIV-positive patients   inhibitors. Even a single dose of such agents in the absence of other
                                               91
        who received CODOX-M/IVAC without rituximab.  In a prospec-  antiretroviral  agents  may  lead  to  resistance  to  that  class  of  agents.
        tive Spanish study, HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative patients   Thus  when  an  interruption  of  antiretroviral  therapy  is  planned,
        with BL were treated with six cycles of intensive chemotherapy and   specific strategies have been advocated, including a “staggered stop”
        rituximab and were found to have comparable outcomes, regardless   or  a  change  to  a  regimen  with  components  that  have  similar
                    92
        of  HIV  status.   In  this  study  all  HIV-seropositive  patients  were   half-lives. 94
                                                          +
        required to be on HAART to enroll, and the majority had CD4    For  patients  already  on  antiretroviral  treatment  at  the  time  of
                                  3
        counts of greater than 200 cells/mm . Granulocyte colony-stimulating   lymphoma diagnosis, the particulars of the regimen should be con-
        factor support was used throughout chemotherapy cycles, as well as   sidered during the pretreatment evaluation. Atazanavir and indinavir
        PJP and other antimicrobial prophylaxis. Differences in induction-  are associated with hyperbilirubinemia as a result of UGT1A1 inhibi-
                                                                  94
        related mortality, duration of neutropenia, progression-free survival,   tion.  This  is  an  unconjugated  hyperbilirubinemia  similar  to  that
        or  overall  survival  were  not  detected,  although  HIV-seropositive   occurring  with  Gilbert  syndrome.  Elevated  total  bilirubin  in  such
        patients did have significantly more severe mucositis and infectious   patients  is  not  indicative  of  hepatic  involvement  or  other  serious
        complications.                                        hepatic dysfunction and should not guide decisions about chemo-
                                                              therapy dose adjustments. Ritonavir inhibits the clearance of mid-
                                                              azolam, phenytoin, and voriconazole and other agents metabolized
        Dose                                                  by the cytochrome P-450 CYP3A4 pathway.
        Most  would  agree  that  dose  reduction  is  appropriate  in  patients
                    +
                                        3
        with  low  CD4   count  (<100  cells/mm ),  history  of  ongoing   Supportive Care
        opportunistic  infection,  performance  status  below  75%,  or  com-
                                                                                                                +
        promised  organ  function.  Some  regimens  begin  with  a  50%  dose   Although  PJP  prophylaxis  is  recommended  only  when  the  CD4
                                        +
                                                                                     3
        reduction in cyclophosphamide for a CD4  count of less than 100   count is less than 200 cells/mm  for patients with HIV not receiving
               3
        cells/mm  with a built-in dose escalation for the next cycle if well   cytotoxic chemotherapy, prophylaxis is universally recommended for
        tolerated. 84,88                                      patients with HIV receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The following
                                                          +
           Chemotherapy regimens of varying intensity depending on CD4    are also commonly used: fungal prophylaxis with fluconazole; herpes
        count, performance status, and International Prognostic Index score   simplex  and  varicella  prophylaxis  with  acyclovir,  valacyclovir,  or
        have  been  studied,  including  a  comparison  of  low-dose  CHOP   famciclovir; quinolone prophylaxis when neutrophil counts fall below
                                                                         3
        with  standard-dose  CHOP,  with  no  differences  found  in  overall   1000 cells/mm ; and granulocyte growth factors.
   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496