Page 1887 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1887

C H A P T E R  109 


                                                COMPLICATIONS AFTER HEMATOPOIETIC CELL 

                                                                                        TRANSPLANTATION


                                         Shernan G. Holtan, Navneet S. Majhail, and Daniel J. Weisdorf





            The  high-dose  therapy  used  in  hematopoietic  cell  transplantation   reconstitution  and  the  lack  of  immunosuppressive  drug  therapy.
            (HCT)  results  in  toxicities  induced  directly  by  the  treatment  and   Immune  reconstitution  can  take  up  to  2  years  to  fully  recover  in
            secondarily  by  the  prolonged  immunodeficiency  and  extended   allogeneic HCT recipients and may be incomplete because of ongoing
            recovery process. Identification of risk factors for particular complica-  GVHD. Patients with chronic GVHD can be functionally asplenic
            tions allows the design of risk-specific supportive care regimens that   and be at risk for infections by encapsulated bacteria including pneu-
            may reduce the morbidity and mortality accompanying transplanta-  mococcus or H. influenza. In addition, chronic GVHD patients on
            tion.  HCT-related  complications  can  be  broadly  classified  into   long-term immunosuppression remain susceptible to fungi (Aspergil-
            infections,  early  noninfectious  complications  (within  3  months  of   lus spp., Candida spp. and Pneumocystis jiroveci) and viruses including
            HCT), late noninfectious complications (after 3 months of HCT),   CMV and varicella zoster virus (VZV). Additional factors that can
            and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (Table 109.1).   delay immune reconstitution include donor-recipient HLA disparity,
                                                                  with depletion of T cells either through ex vivo graft manipulation or
                                                                  in vivo with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. URDs
            INFECTIONS                                            and possibly UCB as a graft source may also augment infection risks.
                                                                                                                   2,3
                                                                  Antimicrobial prophylaxis should continue beyond the initial post-
            Infections are among the most frequent causes of nonrelapse mortal-  transplant period, typically for at least 3–6 months after cessation of
            ity in HCT recipients and cause significant morbidity, both in the   all immunosuppression, especially in patients being treated for chronic
            early and late transplant period (Table 109.2). Immune defects occur-  GVHD. Some centers use total T cell (CD3+) and particularly CD4
            ring  in  the  posttransplant  period  can  be  divided  into  predictable   cell levels as surrogate markers of T-cell recovery and to guide decisions
            phases based on time from engraftment (sustained absolute neutro-  regarding  the  intensity  and  duration  of  infection  surveillance  and
            phil  count  >500/µL),  with  characteristic  infections  in  each  phase   antimicrobial prophylaxis. Supplemental intravenous immunoglobu-
            (Fig. 109.1). Antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens tailored to address   lin (IVIg) has been considered for patients with persistent hypogam-
            the risk of specific infections during these time periods are effective   maglobulinemia (immunoglobulin G [IgG] levels <400 mg/dL), but
            in limiting the incidence of posttransplant opportunistic infections   its prophylactic use is costly, does not prolong survival or prevent late
            (Table  109.3).  Evidence-based  guidelines  for  preventing  infectious   infections, and may impair humoral immune reconstitution. Patients
            complications in HCT recipients have been published and can be   with GVHD and those with indwelling venous access undergoing
            used  as  a  reference  for  determining  infection  risk  and  assigning   endoscopy or dental procedures should receive antibiotics for endo-
            antimicrobial prophylaxis for individual patients. 1  carditis prophylaxis. Published guidelines are available for immuniza-
              Engraftment generally occurs within 7–14 days in autologous and   tion of HCT survivors (Table 109.4). 1
            10–28 days in allogeneic HCT recipients. Recipients of grafts from   Based on the type and dose of conditioning chemotherapy and
            unrelated  donors  (URD)  or  umbilical  cord  blood  (UCB)  tend  to   radiation, recipients of nonmyeloablative or reduced-intensity condi-
            engraft later compared with sibling donors; marrow grafts recover a   tioning (NMA/RIC) regimens can exhibit varying degrees of myelo-
                                                                           4
            bit more slowly than filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell   suppression.  The incidence of bacterial infections is lower in NMA/
            (PBSC) grafts. Importantly, up to 5% of URDs (or potentially greater   RIC  recipients  because  of  the  shorter  duration  of  posttransplant
            if human leukocyte antigen [HLA]-mismatched) and approximately   neutropenia. However, the degree of lymphodepletion tends to be
            10% of UCB grafts may fail to engraft leading to prolonged neutro-  comparable with that seen with myeloablative regimens and the risks
            penia and extended transfusion dependence. In addition to neutro-  of invasive aspergillosis and CMV reactivation remain unchanged.
            penia, the main risk factors for infection during this preengraftment   Among  UCB  HCT  recipients,  neutrophil  engraftment  and
            phase  are  disruption  of  mucocutaneous  barriers  and  indwelling   immune  reconstitution  can  be  delayed  and  a  higher  incidence  of
            venous  catheters.  Bacterial  infections  can  occur  in  up  to  30%  of   bacterial and viral infections in the early posttransplant period has
            transplant recipients during this initial period and usually arise from   been reported. Overall, the risk of serious infections among children
            normal flora of the skin (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus), orophar-  receiving UCB grafts is comparable with that of URD marrow and is
                                                                                                     2
            ynx,  and  gastrointestinal  tract  (Streptococcus  viridans,  Enterococcus   lower than that of a T-cell depleted graft source.  Among adult UCB
            spp. and enteric gram-negative bacilli). Colonizing yeasts or inhaled   HCT  recipients,  the  incidence  of  infections  is  higher  in  the  early
            airborne molds also invade because of neutropenia and disruption of   posttransplant  period;  however,  infections  do  not  compromise  the
            normal host flora and can lead to systemic mycotic infections (most   risks of overall and nonrelapse mortality compared with URD HCT. 2
            often candida or aspergillus spp.) in 10% to 15% of patients. Reac-  The approach to managing posttransplant infections is generally
            tivation  of  latent  herpes  viruses  (herpes  simplex,  cytomegalovirus   similar to that for infections in patients with cancer, especially acute
            [CMV]  or  human  herpesvirus  [HHV]-6  can  occur,  but  may  be   leukemia  (Chapter  89).  However,  certain  infections,  particularly
            contained by antiviral prophylaxis.                   caused by viruses and fungi, are more common in the HCT popula-
              The predominant immunologic defects seen in the early and late   tion and are discussed in further detail here.
            postengraftment  period  are  impairments  of  cellular  and  humoral
            immune  systems.  This  underlying  severe  immune  dysfunction  is
            enhanced and prolonged by acute and chronic GVHD and by corti-  Febrile Neutropenia
            costeroids and the immunosuppressive agents used for GVHD pre-
            vention and treatment. The incidence of late opportunistic infections   A large proportion of patients develop fever in the early posttrans-
            is much lower in autologous HCT recipients because of faster immune   plantation period though an infectious pathogen is identified in only

                                                                                                                1669
   1882   1883   1884   1885   1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892