Page 2010 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2010

C H A P T E R  118 


                                                                                             HEMAPHERESIS


                                                                     Sandhya R. Panch and Harvey G. Klein





            Therapeutic  bloodletting  is  an  ancient  therapy,  fashionable,  albeit   automated cell separators depends on the number of cells available,
            unproved, and practiced well into the 19th century. About the time   the volume of blood processed, the efficiency of the particular instru-
            that  scientific  skepticism  began  to  temper  the  widespread  use  of   ment, and the separation characteristics of the different cells. Most
            therapeutic phlebotomy, a new technique for blood removal, apher-  commercially available instruments remove platelets and lymphocytes
                                         1
            esis, appeared in the research laboratory.  The term apheresis, derived   extremely  efficiently.  Granulocytes  and  other  mononuclear  cells,
            from a Greek verb meaning “to take away or withdraw,” was coined   including HPCs from peripheral blood, cannot be cleanly separated
            to describe removal of one component of blood with return of the   from  other  cells  by  standard  centrifugal  apheresis  equipment  (Fig.
            remaining components to the donor. Like phlebotomy, apheresis was   118.3). Optimal harvesting of these cells requires special techniques
            used first to treat patients but later became more important for col-  such as stimulating the donor with corticosteroids or cytokines and
            lecting  blood  components  for  transfusion.  Increasingly,  apheresis   adding sedimenting agents to enhance cell separation.
            techniques are used to collect cell populations from the peripheral   Whereas this model accurately estimates removal of cells and large
            blood of healthy donors and patients for purposes of hematopoietic   proteins such as fibrinogen and immunoglobulin (Ig) M, removal of
            stem/progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation and immune cell thera-  smaller solutes such as IgG and albumin-bound drugs is less efficient.
            pies. Annually in the United States, about 1.9 million units of red   Transfer of these moieties from the extravascular to the intravascular
            blood cells (RBCs), 2.5 million units of platelets, and 2500 granulo-  compartment depends both on diffusion along a concentration gradi-
            cyte doses are collected by apheresis and more than 50,000 units of   ent and on active transport. The rate of clearance can be calculated
            peripheral blood-hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (PB-HSPC)   using diffusion coefficients, sieving coefficients, and lymphatic flow
            and therapeutic cellular therapy products are collected at hospital and   rate, although in practice this degree of accuracy is rarely necessary.
            blood center apheresis facilities. 2
                                                                  TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES
            PRINCIPLES OF APHERESIS
                                                                  The plasmapheresis technique that originated in the animal labora-
            The principal objective of apheresis is efficient removal of some cir-  tory required manual resuspension of RBCs and posed a substantial
            culating blood component, either cells (cytapheresis) or some plasma   risk of microbial contamination of the components being reinfused.
            solute (plasmapheresis). For most disorders the treatment goal is to   With the introduction of sterile, disposable, interconnected plastic
            deplete the circulating cell or substance directly responsible for the   blood bags, plasmapheresis became relatively safe and easy. However,
            disease process. Apheresis can also mobilize cells and plasma compo-  manual apheresis proved too inefficient and labor intensive for col-
            nents from tissue depots. For example, lymphocytes may be mobilized   lecting large component volumes and raised concerns that the sepa-
            from  the  spleen  and  lymph  nodes  of  some  patients  with  chronic   rated units of RBCs might be reinfused accidentally into the wrong
            lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs)   donor or patient. The introduction of automated online blood cell
            can be removed from tissue stores in patients with familial hypercho-  separators solved these problems. Automated apheresis instruments
                                                          +
            lesterolemia. The  apheresis  procedure  itself  mobilizes  CD34   cells   use  microprocessor  technology  to  draw  and  anticoagulate  blood,
            from  extravascular  depots  in  peripheral  blood-hematopoietic  stem   separate components either by centrifugation or by filtration, collect
            and progenitor cells  (PB-HSPC)  donors,  resulting in collection  of   the desired component, and recombine the remaining components
                                      +
            more  than  twice  as  many  CD34   cells  than  estimated  based  on   for return to the patient or donor. The equipment contains disposable
            preapheresis peripheral blood cell counts (Fig. 118.1). Apheresis may   plastic software in the blood path and uses anticoagulants containing
            have other, less obvious effects. Lymphocyte depletion may modify   citrate or combinations of citrate and heparin that do not result in
            immune responsiveness in some disease states, possibly by disturbing   clinical anticoagulation of the patient or donor. Most instruments
            the control mechanisms of cellular immune regulation. Plasmapher-  function well at blood flow rates of 30–80 mL/min and can operate
            esis  enhances  splenic  clearance  of  immune  complexes  in  certain   from peripheral venous access or from a variety of multilumen central
            autoimmune disorders. When therapeutic effect is judged by clinical   venous catheters. Newer therapeutic apheresis devices are smaller and
            improvement rather than by efficiency of solute removal, apheresis is   more automated, allowing for implementation of more safety func-
            more often a helpful adjunct than a form of first-line therapy.  tions and improved portability.
              Several  mathematical  models  formulated  for  different  clinical   Because  the  ideal  method  for  treating  disorders  mediated  by
            conditions describe the kinetics of apheresis. Removal of most blood   abnormal plasma components is to remove the offending substance
            constituents  follows  a  logarithmic  curve  (Fig.  118.2). This  model   selectively,  a  variety  of  online  filtration  and  column  adsorption
            assumes  that  the  substance  removed  is  neither  synthesized  nor   techniques have been introduced or proposed. Ligands bound to a
            degraded  substantially  during  the  procedure,  remains  within  the   column matrix may be relatively nonspecific chemical sorbents, such
            intravascular  compartment,  and  mixes  instantaneously  and  com-  as charcoal or heparin, or specific ligands, such as monoclonal anti-
            pletely  with  any  plasma  replacement  solution.  When  the  goal  of   bodies  and  recombinant  protein  antigens.  Two  such  columns  are
            plasmapheresis is to supply a deficient substance, for example, the   commercially available: one using staphylococcal protein A and the
            cleavase ADAMTS13 in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocyto-  other using negatively charged dextran sulfate cellulose beads. Staphy-
            penic  purpura  (TTP),  replacement  follows  logarithmic  kinetics   lococcal protein A has high affinity for the Fc portion of IgG1, IgG2,
            similar to those developed for solute removal. From Fig. 118.2, it is   and IgG4 and for immune complexes containing these IgG subtypes.
            evident that removal of 1.5–2.0 volumes will reduce an intravascular   This column is approved for use in therapeutic apheresis procedures
            substance by approximately 80% and that processing larger volumes   for  patients  with  chronic  immune  thrombocytopenia  and  selected
            results in little additional gain. Specific cell removal with centrifugal   adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The dextran sulfate cellulose

                                                                                                                1781
   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015