Page 382 - Textbook of Pathology, 6th Edition
P. 382

366
             TABLE 14.6: FAB Classification of ALL.
            A. MORPHOLOGIC CRITERIA
           Fab Class               Percent Cases   Morphology                               Cytochemistry
           L1:   Childhood-ALL      More common    Homogeneous small lymphoblasts; scanty   PAS ±
                 (B-ALL, and T-ALL)  in children   cytoplasm, regular round nuclei,         Acid phosphatase ±
                                                   inconspicuous nucleoli
           L2:   Adult-ALL          More frequent  Heterogeneous lymphoblasts; variable amount  PAS ±
                 (mostly T-ALL)     in adults      of cytoplasm, irregular or cleft nuclei, large nucleoli  Acid phosphatase ±
           L3:   Burkitt type-ALL   Uncommon       Large homogeneous lymphoblasts; round nuclei,  PAS –
                 (B-ALL)                           prominent nucleoli, cytoplasmic vacuolation  Acid phosphatase –

            B. CYTOGENETIC AND IMMUNOLOGIC CRITERIA
            Subtype                Incidence      Markers                 FAB Subtype      Cytogenetic Abnormalities
            Pre-B ALL              75%            CD10+ (90%), TdT+       L1, L2           t(9;22) i.e. Philadelphia+ALL
            B cell ALL             5%             CD10+ (50%), TdT-       L3               t(8;14) (Burkitt’s leukaemia)
            T cell ALL             20%            CD10+ (30%), TdT+       L1, L2           14q11
            (TdT= terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)
     SECTION II

           poorly-differentiated, and histiocytic (large cells) types of both  all previous classification systems, and as the name implies,
           nodular and diffuse lymphomas.                      has strong clinical relevance. Based on the natural history of
                                                               disease and long-term survival studies, Working Formula-
           Immunologic classifications.  Lukes-Collins classification
           (1974) was proposed to correlate the type of NHL with the  tions divides all NHLs into following 3 prognostic groups:
           immune system because the identification of T and B-cells  Low-grade NHL: 5-year survival 50-70%
           and their subpopulations had become possible in early 70s.  Intermediate-grade NHL: 5-year survival 35-45%
           Its subsequent modification was Kiel classification (1981). Both  High-grade NHL: 5-year survival 25-35%.
           these classifications employed immunologic markers for  In this classification, no attempt is made to determine
           tumour cells, and divided all malignant lymphomas into  whether the tumour cells have origin from B-cells, T-cells or
           either B-cell or T-cell origin, and rarely of macrophages. The  macrophages. Each prognostic group includes a few
           B and T-cell tumours were further subdivided on the basis  morphologic subtypes, and lastly, a miscellaneous group is
           of their light microscopic characteristics. The majority of NHL  also described.
           were B lymphocyte derivatives and arise from follicular  Working Formulations still has many takers in several
           centre cells (FCC). The FCC in the germinal centre undergo  centres and is retained in Table 14.7.
           transformation to become large immunoblasts and pass
           through the four stages—small cleaved cells and large cleaved  REAL classification (1994). International Lymphoma Study
           cells, small non-cleaved cells and large non-cleaved cells.  Group (Harris et al) proposed another classification called
              Though these classification schemes were immuno-
           logically correct, they were unclear about varying prognosis    TABLE 14.7: Classiifcation of NHL-Working Formulations
           of different clinical types of NHL of either B-cell or T-cell  for Clinical Usage (1982).
     Haematology and Lymphoreticular Tissues
           origin.
                                                                I.  LOW-GRADE
           II. OLD CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CLASSIFICATIONS. In           A)  Small lymphocytic
           view of the objections to above pure morphologic and    B)  Follicular, predominantly small cleaved cell
           immunologically correct classifications, following two  C)  Follicular, mixed small and large cleaved cell
           clinically relevant classifications were proposed which cannot  II. INTERMEDIATE-GRADE
           be readily abandoned:                                   D)  Follicular, predominantly large cell
           FAB classification of lymphoid leukaemia. Although old,  E)  Diffuse, small cleaved cell
           FAB classification for lymphoid leukaemia was initially  F)  Diffuse, mixed small and large cell
           based on morphology and cytochemistry into 3 types of ALL  G)  Diffuse, large, cell
           (L1 to L3), but was subsequently revised to include  III. HIGH-GRADE
           cytogenetic and immunologic features as well (Table 14.6).  H)  Large cell, immunoblastic
           FAB classification is still followed in many centres where  I)  Lymphoblastic
           both pathologists and clinicians  stick to labelling lymphoid  J)  Small non-cleaved cell (Burkitt’s)
           leukaemia separate from lymphomas.                   IV. MISCELLANEOUS
           Working Formulations for Clinical Usage (1982). This    1.  Adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma
           classification proposed by a panel of experts from National  2.  Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
           Cancer Institute of the US incorporates the best features of  3.  Histiocytic (Histiocytic medullary reticulosis)
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387