Page 366 - 9780077418427.pdf
P. 366

/Users/user-f465/Desktop
          tiL12214_ch13_323-350.indd Page 343  9/3/10  6:15 PM user-f465
          tiL12214_ch13_323-350.indd Page 343  9/3/10  6:15 PM user-f465                                                /Users/user-f465/Desktop











                           2.  Cleaning up the damaged reactor   The Chernobyl accident was the result   high level and fuel elements ruptured. A
                               vessel and core required more than   of a combination of a poorly engineered   steam explosion moved the reactor cap,
                               10 years to cut it up, pack it into canis-  reactor design, poorly trained reactor oper-    exposing  individual fuel channels and
                             ters, and ship everything to the Federal   ators, and serious mistakes made by the   releasing fission products to the environ-
                               Nuclear Reservation at Idaho Falls.  operators on the day of the accident.  ment. A second steam explosion knocked a
                           3.  The cost of the cleanup was more than   The reactor design was flawed because   hole in the roof, exposing more of the reac-
                             $1 billion.                     at low power, steam tended to form pockets   tor core, and the graphite, which served as a
                                                             in the water-filled fuel channels, creating a   moderator, burst into flames. The graphite
                           4.  Changes have been made at other
                             nuclear power plants as a consequence:   condition of instability. Instability occurred   burned for 9 days,  releasing about 324 mil-
                                                                                                           18
                             Pressure relief valves have been   because (1) steam is not as efficient at cool-  lion Ci (12 × 10  Bq) into the environment.
                             removed; operators can no longer turn   ing as is liquid water and (2) liquid water   The fiery release of radioactivity was
                             off the emergency cooling system; and,   acts as a moderator and neutron absorber   finally stopped by using a helicopter to drop
                             operators must now spend about one-  while steam does not. Excess steam there-  sand, boron, lead, and other materials onto
                             fourth of their time in training.  fore leads to overheating and increased   the burning graphite reactor. After the fire
                                                             power generation. Increased power can lead   was out, the remains of the reactor were
                                                             to increased steam generation, which leads   covered with a large concrete shelter.
                          CHERNOBYL                          to further increases in power. This coupled   In addition to destroying the reac-
                          The Soviet-designed Chernobyl reactor was   response is very difficult to control because   tor, the accident killed 30 people, with 28
                          a pressurized water reactor with individual   it feeds itself.       of these dying from radiation exposure.
                          fuel channels, which is very different from   On April 25, 1986, the operators of   Another 134 people were treated for acute
                          the pressurized water reactors used in the   Chernobyl unit 4 started a test to find out   radiation poisoning, and all recovered from
                          United States. The Chernobyl reactor was   how long the turbines would spin and sup-  the immediate effects.
                          constructed with each fuel assembly in an   ply power following the loss of electrical   Cleanup crews over the next year
                          individual pressure tube with circulating   power. The operators disabled the automatic   received about 10 rem (100 millisieverts)
                          pressurized water. This heated water was   shutdown mechanisms and then started the   to 25 rem (250 millisieverts), and some
                          circulated to a steam separator, and the steam   test early on April 26, 1986. The plan was to   received as much as 50 rem (500 mil-
                          was directed to turbines, which turned a   stabilize the reactor at 1,000 MW, but an error   lisieverts). In addition to this direct expo-
                          generator to produce electricity. Graphite   was made; the power fell to about  30 MW,   sure, large expanses of Belarus, Ukraine,
                          blocks surrounded the pressure tubes, serving   and pockets of steam became a problem.   and Russia were contaminated by radio-
                          as moderators to slow the neutrons involved   Operators tried to increase the power by     active fallout from the reactor fire. Hundreds
                          in the chain reaction. The graphite was cooled   removing all the control rods. At 1 a.m., they   of thousands of people have been resettled
                          by a mixture of helium and nitrogen. The   were able to stabilize the reactor at  200 MW.   into less contaminated areas. The World
                          reactor core was located in a concrete bunker   Then instability returned, and the operators   Health Organization and other interna-
                          that acted as a radiation shield. The top part   were making continuous adjustments to   tional agencies have studied the data to
                          was a steel cap and shield that supported the   maintain a constant power. They reduced   understand the impact of radiation-related
                          fuel assemblies. There were no containment   the feedwater to maintain steam pressure,   disease. These studies do confirm a rising
                          buildings around the Soviet reactors as there   and this created even more steam voids in   incidence of thyroid cancer but no  increases
                          are in the United States.          the fuel channels. Power surged to a very   in leukemia so far.






                       point in the Sun’s life—with about 5 billion years to go—the core   The fusion process would seem to be a desirable energy
                       is now 35 percent hydrogen and 65 percent helium. Through   source on earth because (1) two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium
                                                                                2             3
                       fusion, the Sun converts about 650 million tons of hydrogen   (         H) and tritium (         H), undergo fusion at a relatively low tem-
                                                                                1             1
                       to 645 million tons of helium every second. The other roughly   perature; (2) the supply of deuterium is practically unlimited,
                       5 million tons of matter are converted into energy. Even at this   with each gallon of seawater containing about a  teaspoonful of
                       rate, the Sun has enough hydrogen to continue the process for   heavy water; and (3) enormous amounts of energy are released
                       an estimated 5 billion years. There are  several  fusion reactions   with no radioactive by-products.
                       that take place between hydrogen and helium isotopes, includ-  The oceans contain enough deuterium to generate electric-
                       ing the following:                                      ity for the entire world for millions of years, and tritium can be
                                                                               constantly produced by a fusion device. Researchers know what
                                         1    1    2    0
                                                 H +         H →         H +         e  needs to be done to tap this tremendous energy source. The
                                                   1
                                                        1
                                              1
                                         1
                                         2   2     3    0                      problem is how to do it in an economical, continuous energy-
                                                 H +         H →         H +         n
                                                        1
                                         1
                                             1
                                                   2
                                                                               producing fusion reactor. The problem, one of the most difficult
                                      3     3     4      1
                                              He +         He →         He +  2       H  engineering tasks ever attempted, lies in meeting three basic
                                      2
                                                         1
                                                  2
                                            2
                       13-21                                                                     CHAPTER 13  Nuclear Reactions   343
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371