Page 289 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 289

P1: Oyk/
                   0521861241c06  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  1:8  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                                     More Examples                     275












                                                        Figure 9

                            of which was easy to solve. If we had started with a larger grid, we might have
                            had to repeat the splitting many times before reaching easy 2 × 2 problems.
                            Recursion and its relationship to mathematical induction is the subject of our
                            next section.


                                                       Exercises

                              1. Complete the proof in Example 6.2.2 by doing the following proofs. (We
                             ∗
                                use the same notation here as in the example.)
                                (a) Prove that R is a partial order on A .


                                (b) Prove that T is a total order on A and R ⊆ T .
                              2. Suppose R is a partial order on a set A, B ⊆ A, and B is finite. Prove
                                that there is a partial order T on A such that R ⊆ T and ∀x ∈ B∀y ∈
                                 A(xT y ∨ yT x). Note that, in particular, if A is finite we can let B = A,
                                and the conclusion then means that T is a total order on A. Thus, this
                                gives an alternative approach to the proof of the theorem in Example
                                6.2.2. (Hint: Use induction on the number of elements in B. For the
                                induction step, assume the conclusion holds for any set B ⊆ A with n
                                elements, and suppose B is a subset of A with n + 1 elements. Let b be
                                any element of B and let B = B \{b}, a subset of A with n elements. By

                                inductive hypothesis, let T be a partial order on A such that R ⊆ T

                                and ∀x ∈ B ∀y ∈ A(xT y ∨ yT x). Now let A 1 ={x ∈ A | xT b} and




                                 A 2 = A \ A 1 , and let T = T ∪ (A 1 × A 2 ). Prove that T has all the

                                required properties.)
                              3. Suppose R is a total order on a set A. Prove that every finite, nonempty
                                set B ⊆ A has an R-smallest element.
                             ∗
                              4. (a) Suppose R is a relation on A, and ∀x ∈ A∀y ∈ A(xRy ∨ yRx). (Note
                                    that this implies that R is reflexive.) Prove that for every finite,
                                    nonempty set B ⊆ A there is some x ∈ B such that ∀y ∈ B((x, y) ∈
                                    R ◦ R). (Hint: Imitate Example 6.2.1.)
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294