Page 329 - MARSIUM'21 COMP OF PAPER
P. 329

Jamy Ong & Adaviah (2022)




                   3.4. Data Analysis


















                                              Table 3.1: Methods Used in this Research

               ■  4.0 DATA ANALYSIS PLAN
               4.1 Response Rate
                       The sample of this research was decided by implementing Tabachnick and Fidell calculation (2007) where the
               minimum sample of respondents for this research is 135 respondents as stated in Chapter 3. According to Research Info (1998),
               the good survey response for an online survey is above 20%. For customer satisfaction research, the response rates in the
               survey would be the range of 10% to 30% range. The response rate in this survey is 20% where there are 180 respondents
               answered the questionnaire. Hence, the response rate in this research is considered acceptable. An outlier analysis was utilized
               to spot and eliminate the extreme value from the dataset (Grubbs, 1969). The result shown that one set of questionnaires need
               to be eliminated from the dataset. Table 4.1 as below shows the research’s sample size, data collected that can be used in this
               research and the response rate of this research.












                                              Table 4.1 Response Rate of the research

               4.2 Profile of Respondents
                       The table below shows the demographic profiles of the respondents gathered of this research. This research consisted
               of 110 female respondents (61.5%) while the remaining 69 respondents are male respondent (38.5%). Most of the respondent
               aged between 21 to 25 years old with 50.8% (91) followed by the other age group. The lowest age group that responded to this
               survey is respondents that aged above 30 years old with only 15 respondents (8.4%). 80 respondents (44.7%) of the respondents
               had a degree qualification followed by diploma qualification with 29.6% (53), SPM qualification with 14% (25), Master
               qualification with 10.1% (18) and PHD qualification with 1.7% (3). Chinese respondents had the highest involvement with
               49.2% (88) followed by Malay respondents with 32.4 (88), Indian respondents with 17.9% (22) and other ethnicity which is
               Portuguese with 1 respondent (0.6%). The highest 78 respondents (43.6%) used J&T Express Malacca services at least few
               times a year, 51 respondents (28.5%) at least use the services once a year, 31 respondents (17.3%) stated they uses the services
               as monthly basis, 17 respondents (9.5%) use the services on weekly basis and 2 respondents (1.1%) uses the services daily.
               Next, the most popular services chose by the respondents is standard delivery services with 52.5% (94). International Shipping
               Services is the second type of services often used by the respondents with 35 respondents (19.6%) followed by multi-pieces
               shipment (MPS) with 25 respondents (14%), cargo shipping service with 12 respondents (6.7%), cash on delivery services
               with 7 respondents (3.9%) and heavy goods transportation services with 6 respondents (3.4%).

                          Demographic                  Variables           Frequency (F)     Percentage (%)
                                                         Male                   69                38.5
                             Gender
                                                        Female                 110                61.5
                                                   20 years old or below        28                15.6
                              Age
                                                     21 to 25 years old         91                50.8





                                                                                                            308
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334