Page 958 - MARSIUM'21 COMP OF PAPER
P. 958

959                                        Woon & Grace (2022)

            decisions in collecting empirical data (Fahmy & Sohani, 2020). As a result, the statistical evidence collected becomes more related to the
            study.

               A conclusive research design was employed to generate findings and test the hypotheses in this study, and it was used for statistical tests,
            advanced analytical techniques, and larger sample sizes compared with exploratory studies. Conclusive research is more likely to use
            quantitative rather than qualitative techniques and provide a reliable or representative picture of the population by applying valid research
            instruments. In the conclusive research, the techniques used are typically more formal and structured. It provides a solution to verify and
            quantify the findings obtained from exploratory research. Conclusive research is subdivided into descriptive and casual research. Leavy
            (2017) highlighted the role of descriptive research for researchers who wish to define individuals, groupings, activities, events, or contexts.
            Descriptive research creates a description by providing many details, definitions, and contexts.

               Moreover, Lima (2011) pointed out that descriptive research is only used to describe the distribution of existing variables, regardless of
            causality or other hypotheses. This descriptive research was classified into the cross-sectional design and longitudinal design. According to
            Zahner and Steedle (2015), the primary difference between cross-sectional and longitudinal research is that cross-sectional research can
            interview extraordinary samples of individuals on any given occasion. In contrast, longitudinal research can only interview an equal sample
            of  people  throughout  time.  Thus,  this  study  used  a  conclusive  research  design,  including  descriptive  and  cross-sectional  designs,  to
            investigate the relationship between brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality, brand attitude, and purchase intention of robotic
            education.

            3.2 POPULATION AND SAMPLING

               A population is defined as a set or group of all entities that match a set of criteria (Shukla, 2020). In statistics, a population is a term that
            refers to an entire group for which data must be compiled. It is vital to comprise the demographic traits of the population such as age,
            ethnicity, socioeconomic reputation, training level, area of residence, and family income status in the research (Majid, 2018).

               Data sampling is the basis of the research form in collecting the data (Leavy, 2017). Sampling is a term that refers to selecting a
            representative sample from an individual or a large population group for research purposes (Bhardwaj, 2019). According to Bhardwaj (2019),
            sampling has several benefits and downsides. The benefits of sampling are that researchers can obtain more accurate results, and sampling
            is the most appropriate method when resources are restricted. However, sampling’s shortcomings, such as the selection bias, are unavoidable
            (Bhardwaj, 2019).

               Besides, Hairet al. (2018) had clarified that the exploratory factor analysis could not be analysed if the sample has less than 50 respondents
            because it is still subject to other factors. In contrast, simple regression analysis needs at least 50 samples and generally 100 samples for
            most research situations. As a result, the sample size for this study is 200 (Memon et al., 2020). According to Alberta et al. (2016), non-
            probability sampling is a type of sampling in which the chance that each member of the population in the sample will be selected is unknown.
            Judgemental sampling is a non-probability sampling method used to select the representative from the population for the researchers to
            propose.  Therefore,  this  study  can  use  the  non-probability  sampling  technique  under  a  judgmental  sampling  technique  to  select  the
            respondents who would send their kids to robotics education. The questionnaire was distributed using online channels such as Facebook,
            Instagram, and WhatsApp to 200 Malaysian parents in Malaysia who have children aged 5 to 15.


            3.3 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

               A quantitative study could be a kind of research that collects numerical data and analyses it using statistical methods (Boru, 2017).
            Alberta et al. (2016) highlighted that self-report instruments, surveys, observation, and biophysical measures as examples of quantitative
            instruments. Therefore, researchers used a questionnaire to investigate the customer’s purchase intention towards robotics education. The
            questionnaire in a Google Form was used to collect primary data from respondents through online channels. The questionnaire was designed
            based on demographics using the Likert scale to measure factors that influence the purchase intention of the respondents. As a result, the
            survey was divided into two sections: Section A and Section B. The ten questions in section A of the questionnaire comprise respondents’
            demographic profiles, such as age, gender, ethnicity, and family income. Section B comprises twenty-two questions related to respondents’
            brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality and brand attitude, and purchase intention of robotic education (Sudhana et al., 2020).

               In addition, four factors affecting consumer purchase intentions, namely brand awareness, brand associations, perceived quality, and
            brand attitude, were included in the survey (Shamsudin, 2020). Scales can be used to quantify specific data. For example, a Likert scale
            provides precise response options, such as strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree, strongly disagree (Adams, 2016; Jilcha, 2019). The Likert
            scale (1=strongly agree, 5=strongly disagree) was applied in this study, in which respondents expressed their level of agreement with a series
            of statements. The highest score assigned to each statement reflected the degree of agreement. Lastly, sifting, processing, and analysis of all
            data obtained will be performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).







                                                                                                                959
   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963