Page 359 - leadership-experience-2008
P. 359

CikguOnline
      CikguOnline
            340                                                               PART 4: THE LEADER AS A RELATIONSHIP BUILDER
                                   of the term diversity presents problems. In many European languages, the closest
                                   word implies separation rather than the inclusion sought by U.S. diversity pro-
                                   grams.  Foreign fi rms doing business in the United States face similar challenges
                                         61
                                   understanding and dealing with diversity issues. For example, Japanese leaders at
                                   Toyota Motor Company seriously bungled the handling of a sexual harassment
                                   complaint in the company’s North American division, leading to a lawsuit. When
                                   Sayaka Kobayashi sent a letter to Dennis Cuneo, senior vice president of Toyota
                                   North America, saying she had endured months of romantic and sexual advances
                                   from her boss, Cuneo told her he would discuss the issue with the boss, Hideaki
                                   Otaka. However, Cuneo allegedly said that he didn’t want to offend the man (a
                                   cultural norm), so he planned to say it was Kobayashi’s boyfriend who was upset
                                   about the overtures. European companies have also been tripped up because of a
                                   lack of understanding of the American concept of sexual harassment, according
                                   to employment lawyer Wayne N. Outten. “There are some European countries
                                          where a certain degree of what we would consider over-the-line . . . is
                                               more the norm in the culture,” Outten says. 62
             Action Memo
                                                   National cultures are intangible, pervasive, and diffi cult  to
                                               comprehend. However, it is imperative that leaders in international
             Social value differences can signifi  cantly
                                              organizations learn to understand local cultures and deal with them
            affect leadership, working relationships,
                                              effectively. As C.R. “Dick” Shoemate, chairman and CEO of Best-
            and organizational functioning. Answer the
                                              foods, says, “It takes a special kind of leadership to deal with the dif-
           questions in Leader’s Self-Insight 11.3 to
                                             ferences in a multicountry, multicultural organization. . . .” Bestfoods
           better understand the social values of your
          classmates or coworkers.
                                             uses cross-border assignments and extensive individual coaching to
                                                                                 63
                                            train people to lead in different cultures.  One approach to under-
                                            standing other cultures is to look at how social value systems differ.
                                   Social Value Systems
                                   Research done by Geert Hofstede on IBM employees in 40 countries discovered
                                   that mind-set and cultural values on issues such as individualism versus collectiv-
                                   ism strongly influence organizational and employee relationships and vary widely

            Power distance                       64
            Power distance
            how much people accept equality   among cultures.  Exhibit 11.4 shows examples of how countries rate on four
            how much people accept equality
            in power; high power distance
            in power; high power distance   signifi cant dimensions.
            refl ects an acceptance of power
            refl ects an acceptance of power
            inequality among institutions,
            inequality among institutions,    •  Power distance. High  power distance means people accept inequality in
            organizations, and individuals.
            organizations, and individuals.   power among institutions, organizations, and individuals. Low power
            Low power distance means
            Low power distance means
            people expect equality in power
            people expect equality in power  distance means people expect equality in power. Countries that value high
                                       power distance are Malaysia, the Philippines, and Panama. Countries that
            Uncertainty avoidance
            Uncertainty avoidance      value low power distance include Denmark, Austria, and Israel.
            the degree to which members
            the degree to which members
            of a society feel uncomfortable
            of a society feel uncomfortable    •  Uncertainty avoidance. High uncertainty avoidance means that members of
            with uncertainty and ambiguity
            with uncertainty and ambiguity   a society feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity and thus
            and thus support beliefs and
            and thus support beliefs and
            behaviors that promise certainty   support beliefs and behaviors that promise certainty and conformity.
            behaviors that promise certainty
            and conformity             Low uncertainty avoidance means that people have a high tolerance for
            and conformity
                                       the unstructured, the unclear, and the unpredictable. High uncertainty
            Individualism
            Individualism
            a value for a loosely knit social
            a value for a loosely knit social   avoidance cultures include Greece, Portugal, and Uruguay. Singapore and
            framework in which individuals
            framework in which individuals   Jamaica are two countries with low uncertainty avoidance values.
            are expected to take care of
            are expected to take care of
            themselves              •  Individualism and collectivism. Individualism reflects a value for a loosely
            themselves
                                       knit social framework in which individuals are expected to take care of
            Collectivism
            Collectivism               themselves. Collectivism is a preference for a tightly knit social framework
            a preference for a tightly knit
            a preference for a tightly knit   in which people look out for one another and organizations protect their
            social framework in which
            social framework in which
            people look out for one another
            people look out for one another   members’ interests. Countries with individualist values include the United
            and organizations protect their
            and organizations protect their   States, Great Britain, and Canada. Countries with collectivist values are
            members’ interests
            members’ interests         Guatemala, Ecuador, and Panama.
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364