Page 305 - Kryukov_M_V_-_Sistema_rodstva_kitaytsev_-_1972

271. Сljen T. S. and S h r y o k S. K-, Chinese Relationship Terms,—
«American Anthropologist», vol. 34, ,1932, № 4.
272. C o n a n t F. P., Jarawa Kin Systems of Reference and Adress,—
«Anthropological Linguistics», vol. 3, 1901.
273. D a v i s K. and W a r n e r W. L., Structural analysis of Kinship,—
«American Anthropologist», vol. 39, 1937, № 2.
274. D o l e G., The Classification of Yankee Nomenclature in the Light of
Evolution of Kinship,— in:. «.Essays in the Science of Culture» (ed. by
G. Doll and R. Carneiro), New York, 1960.
275. D o l e G., Generation Kinship Nomenclature as an Adaptation to
Endogamy,— «Southwestern journal of Anthropology», vol. 25, 1969, №2.
276. O o l e G., The Lineage Pattern of Kinship Nomenclature,— «South-
western Journal of Anthropology», vol. 21, 1965, № 1.
277. D o l e G., The Development of Patterns of Kinship Nomenclature
(Ph. D. thesis), Ann Arbor, 1957.
278. D r i v e r H., M a s s e y W., Comparative Studies of North American
'Indians,— «Transactions of the American philosophical society», 1957, t. 47.
279. O u r k h e i m E., M a u s s M., De quelques formes primitives de clas-
sification, «L'Annee sociologique», 1903, № VI.
s
280. E d m on e n M. S., Kinship Terms and Kinship Concepts,— «Ameri-
can Anthropologist», vol. 59, 1967, № 2.
281. Eggan F. (ed.), Social Anthropology of North American Tribes,
Chicago, 1955.
282. IE g g a n F., Historical Changes in Choctaw Kinstip Systems,—
«American Anthropologist», vol. 39, 1937, № 1.
283. E g g a n F., The Cheyenni and Arapaho Kinship System,— «Social
Authropology of North American Tribes», Chicago, 1955.
t
284. Evans-IP ri c h a rd, Kinship and Marriage Among the Nuer,
Oxford, 1951.
285. E v e r s I., Das alteste Recht der Russen in seiner geschichtlichen
Entwicklung, Dorpat-Hamburg, 1826.
286. F e i Hsiao-t'ung, Peasant Life in China, New York, 1939.
287. F e i H s i a o-t'u n g, The Problem of Chinese Relationship Terms,—
«Monumenta Serica», vol. 2, 1936, № 1.
288. F e n g Ha n-y i, The Chinese Kinship System,— «Harvard Journal of
Asiatic Studies», vol. 2, 1937, № 2.
289. F e n g Han-ch i, The Chinese Kinship System, New York, 1946.
290. F e n g Han-yi, Teknonimy as a Formative Factor in the Chinese
Kinship System,— «American Anthropologist», vol. 38, 1936, № I.
291. F i r t h R., Marriage and the Classificatory System of Relationship,—
«Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute», vol. 60, 1930.
292. iF i r t h R., We, the Tikopia, New York, 1936.
293. F i s c h e r H. Th., The Cognates in the Minangkabau Kinship Struc-
ture,— «Oceania», vol. 35, 1964, № 2.
294. F r a z e r E., -Loch a r t J., Index to the Tso Chuan, Oxford, 1930.
295. F r i s h J. and S h u t z N., Componentional Analysis and Semantic
(Reconstruction,— «Ethnology», vol. 3,1967.
296. F u Ma o-c h i, The Lolo Kinship Terms as Affuted by the Sex of the
Speaker,— «Asia Major», vol. 2, ,pt 1, 1956.
297. G i f f о r d E. W., A Problem in Kinship Terminology,— «American
Anthropologist», vol. 42, 1940, № 1.
298. G i l e s G., Chinese Dictionary, Peiping, 194U.
299. G oo d n o u gh W. H., The Componential Analysis and the Study
e
of meaning,— «Language», vol. 32, 1956, № 1.
300. G o o d e n o u g h W. H., Componential Analysis of Konkama kinship
Terminology,— «Explorations in cultural Anthropology», New York, 1964.
301. G o o d e n o u g h W. H., A problem in Malayo-Polinesian Social
Organisation,— «American Anthropologist», vol. 57, 1955, № 1.
302. H a m m e 1 E., An Agorithm for Grow-Omaha Solutions,— «American
Anthropologist», vol. 67. 1965. № 5.
296