Page 310 - Kryukov_M_V_-_Sistema_rodstva_kitaytsev_-_1972
P. 310

SUMMARY






            As  ackhowledged  by  most  20th  century  ethnologists,  a  relation  exists
        between  kinship  nomenclature  and  social  organization.  But  the  question  of
        the  degree  and  the  nature  of  this  relation  has  not  yet  been  completely
        settled.
            Some  preconditions  for  the  satisfactory  solution  of  the  question  are  to>
        be  taken  into  account,  the  problem  of  the  typology  of  kinship  patterns  as
        well  as  their  historical  consequences  being  the  most  important  ones.
            Two  different  methods  of  singling  out  types  of  kinship  systems  are
        used.  One  deals  with  synchronous  treatment  of  systems  available  through
        ethnographic  investigations.  It  is  possible  to  compare  the  various  termionolo-
        gies  as  the  number  of  described  systems  in  increasing.  But  the  shortcoming
        of  this  method  is  its  failure  to  demonstrate  immediately  the  historicaf
        interrelation  between  the  established  types  of  kinship  nomenclature.
            The  other  method  is  a  diachronic  study  of  the  subsequent  stages  of
        development  of  a  given  system.  It  can  be  used  to  analyze  the  ethnographic
        data  obtained  over  a  considerable  period  of  time;  more  specific  for  the
        diachronic  method  are  written  historical  sources  concerning  the  early
        history  of  civilized  societies  which  is  beyond  the  limits  of  ethnographic-
        investigations.
           The  combination  of  the  two  methods  is  even  more  useful.  Unfortunately
        it  is  acceptable  but  for  a  few  societies.  Among  them  the  Chinese  society  is-
        unquestionably  of  a  great  interest.  It  provides  a  unique  example  of  a
        kinship  system  the  history  of  which  is  documented  for  the  period  of  at
        least  thirty  centuries;  a  dozen  of  modern  nomenclatures  in  various  dialects
        of  the  Chinese  language  have  been  comparatively  studied  as  well.  The
        present  author  agrees  with  D.  IA.  Olderogge  that  «the  investigation  of  the
        Chinese  kinship  system  is  extremely  interesting  for  the  student  of  social
        history.  The  possibility  to  examine  the  changes  in  this  system  during  several
        thousand  years  promises  more  theoretical  results  than  the  study  of  any
        other  systems»  (Olderogge,  1951).
           The  purpose  of  the  present  study  is  to  substantiate  the  main  shifts  in
                                                                   301
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315