Page 307 - Kryukov_M_V_-_Sistema_rodstva_kitaytsev_-_1972

332. L a n e B. S., Varieties of Cross-cousin Marriage and Incest Taboos:
Structure and Causality,—D о 1 e G. E. and C a r n e i r o R. L. (ed.),
Essays in the Science of Culture, New York, 1960.
333. L a n g J., The Identical Structure of the Kinship Systems of Certain.
Ural-Altaic and Indian peoples,— «Acta Ethnographica», vol. 11, 1962,.
fasc. 1—2.
334. L a n g J., A New Trend in the Interpretation of Classificatory
System,— «Acta Ethnographica», vol. 15, 1966, fasc. 1—2.
335. La t o u r e t t e K. S., The Chinese, their History and Culture,.
New York, 1946.
336. Lee K., The Place of Kinship Terms in Wihtu' Speech,— «American
Anthropologist», vol. 42, 1940, № 5.
387. L e s s e r A., Kinship Origins in the Light of Some Distributions,—
«American Anthropologist», vol. 31, 1929.
338. L e t о u r n e a u С h., The Evolution of Marriage, London, 1930.
339. Lev i-S t r a u s s Cl., Les structures elementaires de parente, Paris,
1949.
340. Lev i-S t r a u s s Cl., Anthropologie structurale, Paris, 1958.
341. Levi-'St r u s s С 1., The Future of Kinship Studies,—«Proceedings
a
of the Royal Anthropological Institute for 1965».
s
342. Liu P i n g-h u n g , An Interpretation of the Kinship System of Royal
House of tti£ Shang Dynasty,— «Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology,
Acadamia Sinica», № 19, 1965.
343. L 1 о i d P. C, Agnatic and Gognatic Descent Among the Yoruba,—
«Man», vol. I, 1966, № 4.
344. L o f t i e r L., A Diachronic View of Burmese Kinship Terminologies,—
«Proceedings of the VIII QIISAE», Tokyo —Kyoto, 1969.
345. L о u n s b u г у F. L., The Structure of the Latin Kinship System and
its Relationship to Social Organization,— «VII me Congres international
des sciences anthropologiques et ethnologiques», Moscou, 1967, vol. IV.
346. L о u n s b u г у F. L., The Structural Analysis of Kinship Semantics,—
«Preprints of Papers for the 9 th International Congress of linguists»,.
1962.
347. L o u n s b u r y F. G., A Formal Account of the Crow- and Omaha-
type Kinship Terminologies,— G o o d e n o u g h (ed.),— «Explorations
in Cultural Anthropology», 1964, New York.
348. L o u n s b u r y F. G., Another View of the Trobriand Kinship Cate-
gories,— «American Anthropologist», vol. 67, 1965, № 5.
349. L o w i e R., Exogamy and Classificatory Systems of Relationship,—
American Anthropologist», vol. 17, 1915, № 2.
360. L о w i e R., Historical and Sociological Interpretations of Kinship
Terminologies,— «Holmes anniversary volume», Washington, 1916.
301. L o w i e R., Family and sib,— «American Anthropologist», vol. 21,
H919, № 1.
352. L o w i e R., Primitive Society, New York, 1920.
353. L o w i e R., Relationship Terms,— «Encyclopeadia Britannica», 12-th
ed., 1922.
354. L o w i e R., A Note on Relationship Terminologies,— «American
Anthropologist», vol. 30, Г928.
355. L o w i e R., Cultural Anthropology: a science,— «American Journal
of Sociology», vol. 42, 1936, № 3.
356. L o w i e R.,.Culture and Ethnology, New York, 1917.
367. L o w i e R., Kinship, New York, 1919.
358. M a 1 i n о w s к i В., Kinship,— «Man», 1930, № 17.
k
359. IM a i n o Т., The Family System in China,—«Transactions of the
3-<d World Congress of Sociology», vol. 4, London, 1956.
360. M a r a n d a P., Kinship Semantics,— «Anthropos», vol. 59, 1964, № 34.
361. Me Coy J., Chinese Kin Terms of Reference and Adress,— F r e e d -
m a n M. (ed.), Family and kinship in Chinese Society, Stanford, 1970,
362. Me L e n n a n J. F., Studies in Ancient History, London, 1876.
298