Page 262 - Applied Statistics with R
P. 262
262 CHAPTER 13. MODEL DIAGNOSTICS
̂
E[ ] = ,
and variance
̂
⊤
2
Var[ ] = ( ) −1 .
̂
In particular, an individual parameter, say had a normal distribution
̂
2
∼ ( , )
where was the matrix defined as
−1
⊤
= ( ) .
We then used this fact to define
̂
−
√ ∼ − ,
which we used to perform hypothesis testing.
2
So far we have looked at various metrics such as RMSE, RSE and to deter-
mine how well our model fit our data. Each of these in some way considers the
expression
2
∑( − ̂ ) .
=1
So, essentially each of these looks at how close the data points are to the model.
However is that all we care about?
• It could be that the errors are made in a systematic way, which means
that our model is misspecified. We may need additional interaction terms,
or polynomial terms which we will see later.
• It is also possible that at a particular set of predictor values, the errors are
very small, but at a different set of predictor values, the errors are large.
• Perhaps most of the errors are very small, but some are very large. This
would suggest that the errors do not follow a normal distribution.

