Page 322 - Cardiac Nursing

xd
q
99.
q
6
/29
6
6
1-2
c.
Pa
a
a
ara
q
c.
ara
g
p
g
g
A
a
p
p
e 2
Pa
M
/29
In
1
1
0:2
0:2
/09
xd
99.
/09
98
98
7 P
1-2
LWB
LWBK340-c14_
LWB K34 0-c 14_ p p pp291-299.qxd 6/29/09 10:27 PM Page 298 Aptara Inc.
K34
a
14_
0-c
e 2
M
7 P
29
29
In
t
ara
A
t
298 P A R T III / Assessment of Heart Disease
artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction by gated FDG-PET. Journal 38. Klem, I., Heitner, J. F., Shah, D. J., et al. (2006). Improved detection of
of Nuclear Cardiology, 13(2), 210–219. coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic reso-
18. Klein, C., Nekolla, S. G., Bengel, F. M., et al. (2002). Assessment of my- nance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. Journal of
7
ocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: the American College of Cardiology, 47(8), 1630–1638.
7
Comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation, 105(2), 39. Nagel, E., Klein, C., Paetsch, I., et al. (2003). Magnetic resonance perfu-
162–167. sion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery dis-
19. Alderman, E. L., Fisher, L. D., Litwin, P. (1983). Results of coronary ar- ease. Circulation, 108(4), 432–437.
tery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circu- 40. Kim, R. J., Fieno, D. S., Parrish, T. B., et al. (1999). Relationship of MRI
lation, 68(4), 785–795. delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and con-
20. Ragosta, M., Beller, G. A., Watson, D. D., et al. (1993). Quantitative pla- tractile function. Circulation, 100(19), 1992–2002.
nar rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of myocardial viability 41. Wagner, A., Mahrholdt, H., Holly, T. A., et al. (2003). Contrast-enhanced
and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: An
Circulation, 87(5), 1630–1641. imaging study. Lancet, 361(9355), 374–379.
7
7
21. Pagley, P. R., Beller, G. A., Watson, D. D., et al. (1997). Improved out- 42. Yuan, C., Beach, K. W., Smith, L. H., Jr., et al. (1998). Measurement of
come after coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomy- atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic
6
6
opathy and residual myocardial viability. Circulation, 96(3), 793–800. resonance imaging. Circulation, 98(24), 2666–2671.
22. Imamaki, M., Maeda, T., Tanaka, S., et al. (2002). Prediction of improve- 43. Hatsukami, T. S., Ross, R., Polissar, N. L., et al. (2000). Visualization of
ment in regional left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque
grafting: Quantitative stress-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation,
myocardial viability. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Torino), 43(5), 102(9), 959–964.
603–607. 44. Yuan, C., Mitsumori, L. M., Ferguson, M. S., et al. (2001). In vivo accu-
23. Hamdan, A., Zafrir, N., Sagie, A., et al. (2006). Modalities to assess my- racy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich
ocardial viability in the modern cardiology era. Coronary Artery Disease, necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid
17(6), 567–576. plaques. Circulation, 104(17), 2051–2056.
7
7
24. Wu, Y. W., Tadamura, E., Kanao, S., et al. (2007). Myocardial viability by 45. Yuan, C., Zhang, S. X., Polissar, N. L., et al. (2002). Identification of fi-
contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with brous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated
coronary artery disease: Comparison with gated single-photon emission with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation, 105(2),
tomography and FDG position emission tomography. International Jour- 181–185.
nal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 23(6), 757–765. 46. Takaya, N., Yuan, C., Chu, B., et al. (2005). Presence of intraplaque hem-
25. Allman, K. C., Shaw, L. J., Hachamovitch, R., et al. (2002). Myocardial orrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: A high-
viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation, 111(21),
with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: A meta- 2768–2775.
analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 39(7), 1151–1158. 47. Shellock, F. G. (2008) from http://www.mrisafety.com.
26. Sharir, T., Rabinowitz, B., Livschitz, S., et al. (1998). Underestimation of 48. Achenbach, S., Ropers, D., Pohle, F. K., et al. (2005). Detection of coro-
extent and severity of coronary artery disease by dipyridamole stress thal- nary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 0.75 collimation
6
6
lium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial per- and 375 ms rotation. European Heart Journal, 26(19), 1978–1986.
fusion imaging in patients taking antianginal drugs. Journal of the Ameri- 49. Chartrand-Lefebvre, C., Cadrin-Chênevert, A., Bordeleau, E., et al.
can College of Cardiology, 31(7), 1540–1546. (2007). Coronary computed tomography angiography: Overview of tech-
27. Kostuk, W. J., Ehsani, A. A., Karliner, J. S., et al. (1973). Left ventricular nical aspects, current concepts, and perspectives. Canadian Association of
performance after myocardial infarction assessed by radioisotope angiocar- Radiologists Journal, 58(2), 92.
diography. Circulation, 47(2), 242–249. 50. Cury, R. C., Nieman, K., Shapiro, M. D. (2007). Comprehensive cardiac
7
7
28. Longmore, D. B., Klipstein, R. H., Underwood, S. R., et al. (1985). Di- CT study: Evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and
mensional accuracy of magnetic resonance in studies of the heart. Lancet, myocardial perfusion—Is it possible? Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 14(2),
1(8442), 1360–1362. 229–243.
29. Rehr, R. B., Malloy, C. R., Filipchuk, N. G., et al. (1985). Left ventricu- 51. Leber, A. W., Knez, A., von Ziegler, F., et al. (2005). Quantification of ob-
6
lar volumes measured by MR imaging. Radiology, 156(3), 717—719. structive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed to-
6
30. Sechtem, U., Pflugfelder, P. W., Gould, R. G., et al. (1987). Measurement mography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography
of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR and intravascular ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
imaging. Radiology, 163(3), 697–702. 46(1), 147–154.
6
6
31. Jauhiainen, T., Jarvinen, V. M., Hekali, P. E., et al. (1998). MR gradient 52. Van Mieghem, C. A., McFadden, E. P., de Feyter, P. J., et al. (2006). Non-
echo volumetric analysis of human cardiac casts: Focus on the right ven- invasive detection of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis coupled with as-
tricle. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 22(6), 899–903. sessment of changes in plaque characteristics using novel invasive imaging
32. John, A. S., Dill, T., Brandt, R. R., (2003). Magnetic resonance to assess modalities: The Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study (IBIS). Journal
the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: How does it compare to current di- of the American College of Cardiology, 47(6), 1134–1142.
7
7
agnostic standards? Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(3), 53. Butler, J., Shapiro, M., Reiber, J., et al. (2007). Extent and distribution of
519–526. coronary artery disease: A comparative study of invasive versus noninva-
33. Lin, S. J., Brown, P. A., Watkins, M. P., et al. (2004). Quantification of sive angiography with computed angiography. American Heart Journal,
stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and compari- 153(3), 378–384.
son with Doppler ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Cardiol- 54. O’Rourke, R. A., Brundage, B. H., Froelicher, V. F., et al. (2000). Ameri-
ogy, 44(1), 133–137. can College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus
34. Caruthers, S. D., Lin, S. J., Brown, P., et al. (2003). Practical value of car- Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and
diac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve prognosis of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of
6
6
stenosis: Comparison with echocardiography. Circulation, 108(18), Cardiology, 36(1), 326–340.
2236–2243. 55. Pohle, K., Ropers, D., Maffert, R., et al. (2003). Coronary calcifications
35. Djavidani, B., Debl, K., Lenhart, M., et al. (2005). Planimetry of mitral in young patients with first, unheralded myocardial infarction: A risk fac-
valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American Col- tor matched analysis by electron beam tomography. Heart, 89(6),
lege of Cardiology, 45(12), 2048–2053. 625–628.
36. Hundley, W. G., Li, H. F., Willard, J. E., et al. (1995). Magnetic resonance 56. Raggi, P., Callister, T. Q., Cooil, B., et al. (2000). Identification of
imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by
with invasive techniques. Circulation, 92(5), 1151–1158. electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation, 101(8), 850–855.
37. Ley, S., Eichhorn, J., Ley-Zaporozhan, J., et al. (2007). Evaluation of aor- 57. Schmermund, A., Mohlenkamp, S., Berenbein, S., et al. (2006). Popula-
tic regurgitation in congenital heart disease: Value of MR imaging in com- tion-based assessment of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis using
7
parison to echocardiography. Pediatric Radiology, 37(5), 426–436. electron-beam computed tomography. Atherosclerosis, 185(1), 177–182.
7