Page 1736 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 1736

CHAPTER 124: Toxicology in Adults  1205


                    ion. Accordingly, bicarbonate administration in the presence of signifi-  For example, vancomycin has a molecular weight of 1500 Da, but is
                    cant hypokalemia will not achieve alkaline urine, yet increases the risk   significantly cleared by HD with a high-flux membrane. 87,88
                    of  alkalemia. Since  urinary  alkalinization can  cause  hypokalemia  by     3.  Protein binding: Low protein binding (<90%) facilitates drug
                    alkalemia-induced intracellular potassium shift and by increased urinary   removal by hemodialysis, since only unbound drug is free to cross
                    potassium losses with alkaline diuresis, addition of potassium chloride to   the hemodialysis membrane; for example, for a drug which is 90%
                    the bicarbonate infusion is commonly required and may be considered   protein-bound, hemodialytic removal of 50% of free drug only
                    prophylactically.  We do not recommend the use of acetazolamide to   reduces its concentration in blood passing through the dialyzer by 5%.
                               77
                    induce alkaline diuresis. This therapy causes metabolic acidosis, which
                    can further complicate management, particularly in the case of salicylate     4.  Volume of distribution (Vd): This is the theoretical volume into
                    intoxication (where acidemia increases CNS entry of the drug).  which the intoxicant is distributed. As a general rule, substances with
                     Urinary acidification to enhance elimination of weak bases, such   a Vd of <250 L (approximately 3-4 L/kg) are potentially significantly
                    as phencyclidine and amphetamines, is not recommended. It is not   cleared by hemodialysis. Conversely, hemodialytic removal of sub-
                    an effective elimination technique and carries with it the real risk of   stances with a larger Vd is generally insignificant in comparison to the
                    increased renal injury and systemic metabolic acidosis.  total body load of the substance, which often equilibrates too slowly
                                                                             with the  vascular  space to  allow significant removal.  In  fact, most
                        ■  EXTRACORPOREAL REMOVAL OF TOXINS                  substances substantially removed by HD have a smaller Vd of 1 L/kg.

                    In some instances, treatment of an intoxicated patient with supportive     5.  Intrinsic  clearance  of  the substance: Most drugs have a hemo-
                                                                             dialysis clearance of 5 to 100 mL/min; if a patient’s clearance of a
                    measures, decontamination, and acceleration of renal drug elimination   substance exceeds 500 to 700 mL/70 kg per minute, hemodialysis
                    does not alter the course of events to optimize outcome. Application of   is unlikely to significantly augment the substance’s clearance.  It is
                                                                                                                         87
                    extracorporeal  drug  removal  (ECR)  techniques  may  be  lifesaving  for   important to note that the clearance of a drug at toxic levels may be
                    such patients, although clear proof that ECR favorably alters the course   significantly less than that reported within the therapeutic range,
                    of any intoxication is generally lacking.  Application of ECR for any   because of saturable hepatic metabolism at high drug concentra-
                                                 78
                    intoxication is based on critical appraisal of both the clinical status of   tions (concentration-dependent kinetics) or intoxication-induced
                    the patient and of current available data on the prognosis and treat-  renal, hepatic, or cardiac dysfunction. Furthermore, there is usually
                    ment of the intoxication. In general, ECR should be considered when   a paucity of information regarding the production and relative clear-
                    (1) supportive care fails to stabilize the patient’s clinical status; (2) the   ance (intrinsic vs extracorporeal) of toxic metabolites.
                    intoxication is projected to undergo delayed or insufficient clearance
                    because of renal, hepatic, or cardiac dysfunction; (3) the intoxicating   Complications of HD include
                    agent produces toxic metabolites; or (4) delayed toxicity is characteris-    1.  Intravenous access complications: If possible, temporary vascular
                    tic of the intoxication. 79-81  In addition to these general considerations,    access should be placed in the femoral vein to minimize the poten-
                    specific clinical features or serum drug levels may indicate the necessity   tial for serious complications (pneumothorax, central vessel or nerve
                    for ECR. Finally, physicochemical properties of the intoxicant, and its   injury, or catheter-induced arrhythmia). Vascular access should also
                    pharmacokinetic behavior in overdose (which may differ from the agent’s   be removed as soon as possible (but not before the period for poten-
                    pharmacokinetic properties in the therapeutic range), also dictate the   tial development of rebound intoxication has passed) to minimize
                    feasibility of ECR and the choice of method. Three methods for ECR are   the potential for access infection or thrombosis.
                    generally available: (1) dialysis (usually hemodialysis rather than perito-    2.  Hypophosphatemia: In patients without concomitant renal failure
                    neal dialysis); (2) hemoperfusion; and (3) hemofiltration. Rarely, other
                    techniques such as plasmapheresis and exchange transfusion are consid-  and hyperphosphatemia, the dialysis bath should be supplemented
                                                                             with phosphorus to prevent severe dialysis-induced hypophospha-
                    ered for specific intoxications; these will not be further discussed here.
                                                                             temia. Addition of 1.3 mmol/L of phosphorus to the dialysis bath
                    Hemodialysis:  Hemodialysis (HD) is the treatment of choice for ECR of   should prevent hypophosphatemia.
                    very few intoxicants, because hemoperfusion (HP) provides superior drug     3.  Alkalemia:  Since  the  usual dialysis bath  bicarbonate  (buffer)
                    extraction in most cases in which ECR is considered. Hemodialysis is still   concentration is 35 to 38 mEq/L, severe alkalemia can result from
                    preferred to HP for removal of substances that are particularly dialyzable   hemodialysis against a standard bath in the absence of associated
                    (see below), especially in the presence of metabolic acidosis, renal failure,    acidosis (particularly in the presence of hyperventilation or emesis-
                    dialyzable toxic metabolites, or other HD indications. Hemodialysis   induced metabolic alkalosis). If the predialysis plasma bicarbonate
                    removes water-soluble unbound (free) solutes that are small enough to   concentration is 28 mEq/L or higher, then the bath bicarbonate
                    pass through the pores of the semipermeable dialysis membrane, which   concentration must be lowered to 15 to 28 mEq/L.
                    separates the patient’s blood from the countercurrent flow of the dialy-    4.  Disequilibrium syndrome: Acute neurologic deterioration caused
                    sis bath fluid (which is discarded as effluent dialysate following passage   by large, rapid changes in cerebral tissue osmolality may occur in an
                    through the dialyzer). Solute transport, including transfer of drugs,     acutely uremic patient who receives a prolonged initial session of
                    toxins, or metabolites, occurs by diffusion down the blood-to-dialysis   intensive hemodialysis for drug removal. High-sodium dialysis bath
                    bath concentration gradient, which is maintained by countercurrent flow   and intravenous mannitol may be useful prophylactically in blunt-
                    of dialysate. In addition to low molecular weight and water solubility, both   ing large acute transcellular water shifts caused by HD removal of
                    low protein binding and a small volume of distribution are necessary char-  uremic toxins.
                    acteristics of a substance that is readily cleared by HD. 82-86
                     Criteria for potential dialyzability include:          5.  System saturation: This is not possible using standard hemodi-
                                                                             alysis, because of maintenance of the concentration gradient for
                      1.  Water solubility: Water-soluble substances cross dialysis membranes   diffusion by countercurrent flow (blood vs dialysate), except when
                       more readily than lipid-soluble agents (drugs or metabolites).  a sorbent dialysis system is used. This system is inappropriate for
                      2.  Low molecular weight:  Traditionally,  a  substance  is  described  as   extracorporeal removal of an intoxicant, since the sorbent cartridge
                       small enough to be significantly removed by hemodialysis when it   used to regenerate new dialysis solution from dialysate may become
                       has a molecular weight of <500 daltons (Da). More recently, high-  saturated and cease to function. If such a system is the only available
                       flux dialysis membranes with increased porosity and surface area   option, frequent cartridge changes will be required.
                       have been introduced. Such membranes are capable of removing     6.  Other: Hypotension is a potential adverse effect of HD (or HP),
                       drugs with weights in the middle-molecule range, up to 5000 Da.   particularly if this therapy is instituted in an already unstable








            section11.indd   1205                                                                                      1/19/2015   10:51:58 AM
   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741