Page 44 - T-I JOURNAL19 4
P. 44

692                          MERCIER, RANJIT & REARDON



        In order to assess invention disclosure submis-  faculty member, which was an overall differential
      sions, the data was evaluated by determining the  of almost six percentage points (Figure 3B). The
      number of disclosures listing a female creator and was  average pre-WIT (2011-2013) percentage of inven-
      further segmented by female faculty creators. Over  tion disclosures with female creators (faculty and
      the six-year period that was assessed, the number of  non-faculty) was 33%, while the average post-WIT
      disclosures that listed a female as a creator (faculty  (2014-2016) percentage of female creators (faculty
      and non-faculty) on the disclosure increased from  and non-faculty) was almost 41.8% (Figure 3A). The
      34.8% to 43.8%, representing a nine percentage point  average pre-WIT percentage of invention disclosures
      rise from 2011 to 2016 (Figure 3A). Looking only at  listing at least one female faculty creator was 16.5%
      the faculty population, in 2011, 17.4% of invention  as compared to an average of 22.9% of invention
      disclosures listed a female faculty member, and in  disclosures listing a female faculty member in the
      2016, 23.3% of disclosures had a representative female  post-WIT years (Figure 3B).



                         A. 100%
                             Overall Invention Disclosures  50%
                               75%






                               25%

                                0%
                                           2012
                                                 2013
                                      2011
                                                       Only Male Creators
                                        Female Creators  2014  2015  2016
                         B. 100%
                             Faculty Invention Disclosures  50%
                               75%





                               25%


                                0%
                                      2011
                                           2012
                                                 2013
                                                       Male Faculty
                                        Female Faculty  2014  2015  2016
      Figure 3. Gender distribution of invention disclosures. The total number of invention disclosures was assessed by gender and creator
      type. A. Invention disclosures submissions listing only male creators (both faculty and non-faculty) or having at least one female
      creator (both faculty and non-faculty) was compared to the overall invention disclosures submissions and expressed as a percentage
      to assess growth over time. B. Invention disclosures submissions listing only male faculty creators or having at least one female faculty
      creator was compared to the total number of invention disclosures listing a faculty member and expressed as a percentage to assess
      growth over time.
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49