Page 49 - T-I JOURNAL19 4
P. 49

WOMEN INNOVATOR PROGRAMS IN ACADEMIA                        697



             a similar likelihood that male and female invention  the institution of a women innovator program keeps
             disclosures  become  commercialized  (16).  Such  the topic of unconscious bias relevant in the discus-
             comparison could be revealed by tracking license  sions of the TTO.
             agreements arising from this set of invention disclo-    In summary, there is a national need for more
             sures because the license agreement represents the  universities to elevate their support for women in the
             potential for an idea to have commercial translation  entrepreneurship and innovation space. The findings
             and a measure of partner interest. Since our WIT  of this study suggest that the efforts of the WIT pro-
             program has only been active for three years, and  gram augmented WUSTL OTM’s existing efforts of
             OTM data suggests that most licensing occurs up to  educating the overall potential innovator population
             six years after the invention disclosure, a licensing  in a manner that engaged women innovators spe-
             metric was not measured in this study.     cifically in order to overcome the barriers that have
               Another potential explanation for the disparity  historically limited their participation in technology
             in serial creators could be the decision-making of  transfer activities. WIT provided an intentional outlet
             the TTO and the perspective by creators that a neg-  to the female population at WUSTL for learning
             ative decision to patent could be a disincentive to   about commercialization and building networks
             future participation in technology transfer activ-  to enhance this knowledge. Over the three years of
             ities. Therefore, the conversion rates of invention   WIT programming, more women participated in
             disclosures to provisional patent applications were   technology transfer activities. In the future, it may
             measured. While this decision mostly reflects the   be worthwhile to expand WIT or other women inno-
             decision-making of a TTO to move a technology   vator programs to reach all potential women creators,
             forward further toward commercialization, at times   inclusive of graduate students and postdoctoral fel-
             a TTO will file because of the advocacy of the inves-  lows, because these populations are the future faculty
             tigator. Potential distinctions were observed in how   members at other institutions (and potential lead-
             the office converted disclosures listing female cre-  ers in university start-up companies). While it was
             ators as compared to the overall conversion trend   not the directive of WIT to target graduate students
             and compared to the conversion rate of disclosures   and postdoctoral fellows directly, aspects of the pro-
             with male creators. It appears that the conversion   gramming were open to the general population, and
             rate of female faculty invention disclosures to pro-  graduate students and postdoctoral fellows attended
             visional applications is beginning to align with the   these open WIT events at high levels. At WUSTL, like
             overall rate at which all patents were converted as   many universities across the nation, student and post-
             the WIT program took hold. While it also appeared   doctoral fellow populations are exhibiting extreme
             that female-only disclosures were initially converted   enthusiasm for technology transfer and entrepreneur-
             differentially, it is important to point out that often   ship activities. It would be expected that exposure to
             these disclosures were led by a male faculty member,   technology transfer and commercialization during
             as the female may often be a graduate student or a   the early stages of scientific training would breed
             postdoctoral fellow in the faculty member’s labo-  more familiarity with the process and translate into
             ratory. Therefore, in order to tease out whether a   higher potential to commercialize future work.
             TTO had unconscious bias, it might be important
             to compare disclosure conversions by the gender of   REFERENCES
             the lead creator or to look over a greater time span  1.  Coggburn JD, Neely SR. Publish or perish?
             because the conversion rates of disclosures appeared   Examining academic tenure standards in pub-
             variable year to year. Nonetheless, in our experience,   lic affairs and administration programs. JPAE.
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54