Page 485 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 485

466    UNIT IV  Nursing Theories

           reduced  to  component  parts  and  be  understood.   The basic tenet, human subjectivity, means viewing
           Rather,  persons  are  living  beings  who  are  different   human beings not as things or objects, but as indivis-
           from schemata that divide them. Parse challenges the   ible, unpredictable, everchanging beings (Parse, 1998,
           traditional medical view of nursing and distinguishes   2007b)  and  as  a  mystery  of  being  with  nonbeing.
           the discipline of nursing as a unique, basic science   Human  beings  live  all-at-onceness  as  the  becoming
           focused on human experiences. She supports the no-  visible–invisible  becoming  of  the  emerging  now
           tion  that  nurses  require  a  unique  knowledge  base   (Parse,  2012b).  Parse  posits  that  humans’  presence
           that informs their practice and research, knowledge   with the world is personal and that humans live mean-
           of humanuniverse and health that is essential to ful-  ing as their becoming who they are. As people choose
           fill  their  commitment  to  humankind  (Parse,  1981,   meanings and projects according to their value priori-
           1987, 1993, 2007b, 2010, 2012b).              ties, they coparticipate with the world in indivisible,
             She  drew  on  Rogers’  principles  of  helicy,  inte-  unbounded  ways  (Parse,  1981,  1998,  2007b,  2012b).
           grality,  and  resonancy  and  her  postulates  (energy   Persons  are  inseparable  from  the  world  and  craft
           field,  openness,  pattern,  and  pandimensionality)   unique relationships. A person’s becoming is complex
           (Parse, 1981; Rogers, 1970, 1992). These ideas un-  and  full  of  explicit-implicit  meaning  (Parse,  1981,
           derpin Parse’s notions about persons as open beings   1998, 2007b, 2012b).
           who  relate  with  the  universe  illimitably,  that  is,   Coconstitution means any moment is cocreated
           “with indivisible, unbounded knowing extended to   with the constituents of the situation (Parse, 1981,
           infinity” (Parse, 2007b, p. 308), and who are indivis-  1998, 2007b, 2012b). Human beings choose mean-
           ible,  unpredictable,  everchanging,  and  recognized   ing  with  the  particular  constituents  of  day-to-day
           by patterns (Parse, 1981, 1998, 2007b, 2012b).  life.  Life  happens,  events  unfold  in  expected  and
             From existential-phenomenological thought, Parse   unexpected  ways,  and  the  human  being  coconsti-
           drew on the tenets of intentionality and human sub-  tutes personal meaning and significance. Coconsti-
           jectivity and the corresponding concepts of coconsti-  tution  surfaces  with  opportunities  and  limitations
           tution,  coexistence,  and  situated  freedom  (Parse,   for human beings as they live their presence with
           1981, 1998, 2007b, 2012b). She uses the prefix co on   the  world,  and  as  they  make  choices  about  what
           many of her words to denote the participative nature   things mean and how to proceed. The term coconsti-
           of  persons.  Co  means  together  with,  and,  for  Parse,   tution refers to creating different meanings from the
           humans can never be separated from their relation-  same  situations.  People  change  and  are  changed
           ships with the universe—thus her 2007b conceptual-  through their personal interpretations of life situa-
           izations of humanbecoming and humanuniverse as one   tions.  Various  ways  of  thinking  and  acting  unite
           word. Relationships with the universe include all the   familiar patterns with newly emerging ones as peo-
           linkages  humans  have  with  other  people  and  with   ple craft their unique realities.
           ideas,  projects,  predecessors,  history,  and  culture   Coexistence means “the human is not alone in any
           (Parse, 1981, 1998, 2007b, 2012b).            dimension of becoming” (Parse, 1998, p. 17). Human
             From Parse’s perspective, humans are intentional   beings are always with the world of things, ideas, lan-
           beings.  That  is,  human  beings  have  an  open  and   guage,  unfolding  events,  and  cherished  traditions,
           meaningful stance with the universe and people, proj-  and they also are always with others—not only con-
           ects, and ideas that constitute lived experience. Hu-  temporaries,  but  also  predecessors  and  successors.
           man  beings  are  intentional  whose  involvements  are   Humans are community (Parse, 2003). Indeed, Parse
           not random but are chosen for reasons known and   posits that “without others, one would not know that
           not known. Parse says that being human is being in-  one  is  a  being”  (Parse,  1998,  p.  17).  Persons  think
           tentional  and  present,  open,  and  knowing  with  the   about themselves in relation to others and how they
           world. Intentionality is also about purpose and how   might  be  with  their  plans  and  dreams.  Connected
           persons choose direction, ways of thinking, and act-  with freedom, Parse describes an abiding respect for
           ing with projects and people. People choose attitudes   human change and possibility.
           and  actions  with  illimitable  options  (Parse,  1981,   Finally,  situated  freedom  means  that  human  be-
           1998, 2007b, 2012b).                          ings  emerge  in  the  context  of  a  time  and  history,
   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490