Page 143 - test2
P. 143

of the ram blocks; and (5) function testing of critical functions and circuits that
                   were involved in the attempts to control the well during the first two days
                                           338
                   following the blowout.

                                   3.    Materials Evaluation and Damage Assessment


                          Another critical part of DNV’s forensic work was materials evaluation and
                   damage assessment.  Materials evaluation included: (1) cleaning and examining
                   the BOP rams; (2) cleaning and examining drill pipe segments removed from the
                   BOP stack and the riser; (3) cleaning and examining components extracted
                   during the removal of the rams; and (4) collecting and cleaning all solid objects
                   found within the different ram cavities.

                          DNV assessed the damage to the BOP stack in three different ways: (1)
                   visual inspection and photo documentation; (2) dimensional measurements; and
                   (3) three‐dimensional laser scanning.  In addition, DNV used structural analysis
                                                                                    339
                   and modeling to simulate drill pipe behavior in the wellbore.

                                   4.    ROV Intervention Operations Review

                          DNV reviewed video footage and still photographs taken from a number
                   of different ROVs that were used during attempts to stop the well flow.  This
                   review allowed DNV to assess the condition of the BOP stack when it was still
                   submerged and to try to determine the origin of leaks in the BOP’s hydraulic
                   circuitry.  This review also allowed DNV to assess the impact of various ROV
                                                                      340
                   interventions on the condition of the BOP stack.

                              H.     DNV’s Forensic Examination Findings

                          DNV’s forensic examination found that, as the BSR was closed, the drill
                   pipe was positioned such that the outside corner of the upper BSR blade
                   contacted the drill pipe slightly off center of the drill pipe cross section.  A
                   portion of the pipe cross section was outside of the intended BSR shearing
                   surfaces and would not have sheared as intended.  As the BSR closed, a portion
                   of the drill pipe cross section became trapped between the ram block faces,
                   preventing the blocks from fully closing and sealing.


                   338  DNV Report, Vol.  1, at 23‐24.
                   339  Id. at 23.
                   340  Id. at 24.


                                                            138
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148