Page 192 - test2
P. 192

that question of the hands, in the THINK Plans, and to make them think
                          for themselves and lead them in the right direction by mentoring them.
                          You can tell them what the hazards are, but until they get used to
                          identifying them theirselves, they are only following your lead.  I haven’t
                          given up on this and if I have an epiphany I will send you an email.
                          Believe it or not when I am troubled or stumped I talked with my wife as
                          she is a good listener and gets me headed in the right direction.  Maybe
                          what we need is a new perspective on hazard recognition from someone
                          outside the industry.
                                                463

                          Johnson’s assessment was reinforced by a March 2010 Lloyd’s Register
                   audit of Transocean, which found that “[Rig crews] don’t always know what
                   they don’t know.  Front line crews are potentially working with the mindset that
                   they believe they are fully aware of all the hazards when it is highly likely that
                   they are not.”
                                  464

                          The Lloyd’s audit also evaluated the Deepwater Horizon in March 2010 and
                   found that there was a “strong team culture onboard Deepwater Horizon and the
                   levels of mutual trust evident between the crews means that the rig safety culture
                   was deemed to be robust, largely fair, and inclusive, which was contributing to a
                   ‘just culture.’”   This audit found that the rig crews’ strengths were leadership,
                                  465
                   the workforce’s influence on safety, the level of trust between the teams, and the
                   provision of effective resources to support safe operations.
                                                                                 466

                          But the same audit found weaknesses, including management of change
                   and the complexity of some risk management procedures.  While the majority of
                   the crew was comfortable with identifying and understanding the hazards of
                   their respective jobs, supervisors and rig leadership teams had concerns that:

                            The workforce was not always aware of the hazards they were
                              exposed to, relating to both their job and to other jobs being conducted
                              in the same/adjoining work areas;
                            THINK Plans did not always identify relevant major hazards related to
                              that task;





                   463  BP‐HZN‐MBI00225048.
                   464  TRN‐HCEC 90501.
                   465  TRN‐HCEC 90579.
                   466  Id.


                                                            187
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197