Page 67 - test2
P. 67

On April 19, the day before the blowout, BP pumped cement down the
                   production casing and up into the wellbore annulus above the uppermost
                   hydrocarbon reservoir to prevent hydrocarbons from entering the wellbore.  As
                   discussed above, the annulus cement that was placed across the main
                   hydrocarbon zone was a lower density, nitrified (foam) cement slurry.  At the
                   time of the blowout, the seal assembly had not yet been mechanically locked to
                   the wellhead housing.

                          To analyze the probability of this scenario the Panel commissioned
                   Keystone Engineering Inc. (“Keystone”) to conduct a buoyancy casing analysis.
                   Keystone analyzed eight production casing static force conditions that could
                   have acted upon the production casing and wellhead hanger, and possibly
                   resulted in movement of the casing.  Keystone’s analysis found that six of these
                   eight scenarios were unlikely to have occurred.  Keystone presented two
                   remaining possible scenarios under which seal movement could have resulted
                   from well pressure and forces.  However, the Panel later ruled out both of these
                   scenarios because well intervention operations following the blowout showed
                   that the wellhead seal assembly had, in fact, remained intact during the
                   blowout.
                             152

                          When the Macondo well was secured after the blowout, intervention work
                   began under the direction and supervision of the Unified Area Command with
                   input from BOEMRE, including the Panel and other federal agencies.   This
                                                                                            153
                   intervention work required the participation of companies involved in the
                   drilling of the original Macondo well.

                          During the well intervention operations, observations using remotely
                   operated vehicles (ROVs) found that the Macondo wellhead seal assembly was
                   intact.  On September 9, 2010, technicians from Dril‐Quip Inc., a contractor
                   involved in the intervention operations, used a lead impression tool to take an
                   impression of the hanger and seal assembly.  A lead impression tool is a high
                   tolerance measurement tool that is able to able to detect changes in equipment to
                   within fractions of an inch.  Based on this lead impression, the technicians on the
                   Development Driller II (DDII) relief well operation concluded that the 9‐7/8 inch




                   152  Keystone Report, September 2010.
                   153  The Unified Area Command refers to the unified, interagency response to the Deepwater
                   Horizon oil spill.


                                                             62
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72