Page 82 - test2
P. 82

analysis of the March 8 kick.  This was not the type of incident investigation
                   required by the DWOP, but rather a study of the pore pressure and other
                   geological conditions encountered in the well.  In an email “re‐evaluating how
                   we manage real time pore pressure detection for Macondo type wells,” a BP
                   geologist stated that “we need to have PP [pore pressure] conversations as soon
                   as ANY indicator shows a change in PP” and we “need to be prepared to have
                                                               168
                   some false alarms and not be afraid of it.”   He also noted:

                          Better lines of communication, both amongst the rig subsurface and
                          drilling personnel, and with Houston office need to be reestablished.
                          Preceding each well control event, subtle indicators of pore pressure
                          increase were either not recognized, or not discussed amongst the greater
                          group.  It is the responsibility of the mudloggers and well‐site PP/FG
                          personnel to openly communicate with the well‐site geologist.
                                                                                            169

                   This analysis by the TIGER team, which was focused on geological conditions in
                   the Macondo well, was not intended to address the specific ways in which the rig
                   crew should monitor the well.  Morel, Hafle and Cocales presented a document
                   to the TIGER team on March 18 that addressed some of the events of March 8,
                   but this document did not include a discussion of any measures to be
                   implemented to ensure that the rig crew could detect kicks more quickly and
                               170
                   effectively.   The Panel found no evidence that Morel, Hafle, and Cocales
                   presented information related to the March 8 kick detection problems to anyone
                   else involved in operations at Macondo.

                          After the March 8 incident, BP had to abandon the wellbore (leaving
                   behind a number of costly drilling tools) and perform a bypass to continue
                   drilling the well.   Responding to the kick and conducting the bypass operation
                                     171
                   resulted in additional cost and timing delay for the Macondo well.

                          Except for one person, the rig personnel involved in kick detection and
                   response on March 8, including a mudlogger, drillers, assistant drillers, a senior
                   toolpusher, and toolpushers, were the same individuals on duty on April 20
                   when the blowout occurred.
                                                 172

                   168  BP‐HZN‐MBI00113015.
                   169  BP‐HZN‐MBI00113017.
                   170  BP‐HZN‐BLY00036098.
                   171  A bypass or sidetrack operation is performed by drilling a directional hole to bypass an
                   obstruction in the well.
                   172  One of the mudloggers on duty on April 20 was not involved in the March 8 kick.


                                                             77
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87