Page 91 - test2
P. 91

Hafle discussed this further with David Sims, and they agreed that the
                   Deepwater Horizon crew should move forward with the installation of the lock‐
                   down sleeve as part of its temporary abandonment procedures.   BP chose to do
                                                                                      200
                   this even though the Deepwater Horizon was a rig that conducted exploratory
                   drilling operations – operations that did not typically include the setting of a
                   lock‐down sleeve, which was typically done by a rig that specializes in
                   completion operations.  Indeed, the Panel concluded that none of the BP
                   personnel on the rig on April 20 had experience setting a lock‐down sleeve.
                                                                                                   201
                   Common industry practice is, due to safety concerns, to set the lock‐down sleeve
                   in mud prior to displacement and setting of the cement plug.  Although the crew
                   displaced the mud, the crew never got to the point of setting the lock‐down
                   sleeve.

                          The Panel found no evidence that BP assessed the risks associated with its
                   decision to set the lock‐down sleeve.  This decision increased the risk associated
                   with subsequent procedures, including the setting of the surface plug, the
                   displacement, and the negative test sequence.  In all likelihood, had the lock‐
                   down sleeve been set at a later time, the surface plug would not have been set as
                   deep; the surface plug would have been set sooner; and displacement would not
                   have resulted in a lower pressure differential in the well.

                          Notwithstanding the fact that the crew was unfamiliar with setting the
                   lock‐down sleeve and that this procedure would increase operational risk, there
                   is evidence that members of the crew might have become complacent after
                   drilling was completed.  BP contractor Ross Skidmore, when asked about his
                   concerns on the timing of setting the lock‐down sleeve, testified that “when you
                   get to that point, everybody goes to the mind set that weʹre through, this job is
                   done.”
                          202

                              B.     Setting the Cement Plug

                          On April 16, BP submitted to MMS, and MMS approved, a revised
                   temporary abandonment plan stating that the lock‐down sleeve was to be set

                   200  BP‐HZN‐MBI100446.  One reason to set the lock‐down sleeve during temporary abandonment
                   is to enhance safety by protecting the production casing against uplift forces that might occur
                   during production as a result of hydrocarbons flowing up the wellbore.  The panel, however,
                   found no evidence that BP decided to set the lock‐down sleeve when it did out of safety concerns.
                   201  Testimony of Merrick Kelley, Joint Investigation Hearing, August 27, 2010, at 289‐90.
                   202  Testimony of Ross Skidmore, Joint Investigation Hearing, July 20, 2010, at 263‐64.


                                                             86
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96