Page 95 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 95

CHAPTER 10: Telemedicine and Regionalization  63


                    ill patients in a variety of different care settings. This chapter will out-  In addition to improving mortality, regionalization could lower
                    line conceptual models for telemedicine and regionalization, review the     costs for patients with critical illness. ICUs exhibit economies of scale,
                    existing evidence base in support of these two approaches, and provide   meaning that additional production in terms of patient throughput is
                    practical  guidance  for  clinicians  who  increasingly  will  be  required  to   accompanied by lower per-unit costs.  Most hospital costs are fixed, and
                                                                                                    24
                    develop, manage, and practice in these regional systems of care.  with higher volumes those fixed costs can be spread over more patients,
                                                                          ultimately improving overall efficiency. For example, the cost of a single
                    REGIONALIZATION                                       ECMO machine might be prohibitively expensive for a small commu-
                                                                          nity hospital that might use it one or two times per year. However, if a
                    Regionalization is defined as the systematic transfer of high-risk criti-  large center uses ECMO frequently, the costs of that machine are spread
                    cally ill patients to designated regional referral centers. A regionalized   over many patients, reducing the per-patient costs of ECMO. In this
                    critical care system requires four primary components:  way, concentrating high-risk, high-cost care such as critical care has the
                      • A method to delineate regions, by either geography or political   potential to reduce overall costs for the health system.
                      • A method to objectively stratify hospitals by the level of critical care   ■  UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
                      boundaries

                      they are capable of providing                       Regionalization carries a number of potential unintended consequences
                      • A strategy for triaging patients to designated high-level hospitals  that could limit or even negate any potential clinical or economic ben-
                                                                          efits.  First, upscaling critical care capacity at some hospitals necessarily
                                                                             25
                      • A regulatory body to manage and oversee the system  means downscaling capacity at other hospitals. One effect of such a
                     Although there are few examples of regionalized critical care in exis-  down-scaling may be to reduce the ability of these small hospitals to
                    tence today, regionalized health care exists for several disease syndromes   care for sick patients in an emergency. For example, under a regional-
                    that are analogous to critical care. Regionalized trauma systems are per-  ized scenario smaller hospitals will see fewer cases of sepsis. Septic
                    haps the best example. Most industrial nations have instituted regional-  patients receiving care in these hospitals may be subject to increased
                    ized trauma care in some form. The concept for regionalized trauma   morbidity as a result. In this way, although regionalization may ben-
                    emerged in 1960s out of the advances in emergency medicine and triage   efit patients ultimately transferred to large regional referral centers, it
                    made during the Vietnam conflict, as well as the advocacy work of pro-  may harm patients who receive care at smaller community hospitals.
                    fessional societies that recognized the potential for improved outcomes   Regionalization may also harm small hospitals economically, since many
                    by centralizing care for seriously injured patients.  Most existing trauma   high-margin medical services such as oncology and cardiac surgery
                                                       10
                    systems are supported by specific legislation, and several studies docu-  depend on high-quality critical care. Down-scaling critical care may
                    ment that injured patients receiving care in a trauma center are less likely   force these hospitals to abandon these profitable programs.
                    to experience morbidity and mortality as a result of their injury than   Second, regionalization may place significant capacity strain on
                    similar patients receiving care in a nontrauma center. 11  high-volume referral centers. Many large academic  medical  centers
                     Other clinical domains that are regionalized in some form include   are already under pressure to expand critical care capacity in a setting
                    neonatology,  stroke,  and acute myocardial infarction,  although for-  of limited resources. A persistently high census may reduce access to
                                                            14
                             12
                                   13
                    mal regionalization for these areas is far less prevalent than for trauma.   critical care beds, potentially increasing mortality for some patients.
                    All of these areas, including critical care, share attributes that support   Indeed,  boarding critically ill  patients  in  the  emergency  department
                    the potential benefits of centralized care. These include  or in ICUs unequipped to care for specialty cases is associated with
                                                                          higher mortality, 26,27  a situation that may increase under regionalization.
                      • The high risk for an adverse outcome              Regionalization may also strain our capacity for interhospital transport.
                      • The time sensitive nature of the conditions       Available  evidence  suggests  that  long-distance  transfer  of  critically ill
                                                                                                  28
                      • The extensive infrastructure and stand-ready costs necessary for   patients is both feasible and safe.  However, that reality may change if
                      effective 24-hour care                              the system is required to transfer more patients, and more sick patients,
                      • Demonstrated volume-outcome relationships that suggest that out-  over longer distances.
                                                                           Finally, regionalization may increase rather than decrease health care
                      comes might be improved by centralizing care at high-volume   costs despite the added efficiency from the economies of scale. In addi-
                      centers 15                                          tion to existing health care costs, regionalization incurs the added costs
                     Due to this strong theoretical foundation, regionalization of critical   of routine interhospital transport and regulation of the system. Many
                    care is supported by several multidisciplinary stakeholder groups.  Calls   trauma systems struggle with issues of costs and cost-effectiveness, and
                                                                  16
                    for implementing regionalization of care have occurred both for critical   it is likely that the critical care system, which would be of greater scale,
                    care in general and for specific disease states with a high likelihood of   will have these same issues.
                    critical illness, including acute myocardial infarction, acute stroke, high-
                    risk surgeries, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. 17    ■  EVIDENCE
                        ■  POTENTIAL BENEFITS                             To  date there  are  few direct data  in  support  of regionalized  critical
                                                                          care. As mentioned above, regionalization is indirectly supported by
                    Regionalization has several potential benefits, foremost being the   the existence of volume-outcome relationships and positive evaluations
                    potential for increased survival for critically ill patients. Rapid triage   of analogous systems such as regionalized trauma and neonatal care.
                                                                                                                            25
                    of critical ill patients to hospitals capable of providing definitive criti-  Additional indirect support came from a 2008 study that simulated the
                    cal care could facilitate several time-sensitive evidence-based practices   impact of regionalization for nonsurgical patients in the United States
                    associated with improved outcomes, including thrombolysis for stroke,    receiving mechanical ventilation.  In that study, which analyzed hospi-
                                                                      18
                                                                                                 29
                    therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest,  and early adequate volume   tal discharge data from eight diverse states, nearly 50% of mechanically
                                                   19
                    resuscitation for severe sepsis.  Care at a high-volume regional referral   ventilated patients received care in ICUs with very low admission vol-
                                         20
                    center could also facilitate evidence-based practices that although not   umes. Simulating the transfer of those patients to high-volume centers
                    time sensitive are complex and may be better provided at experienced   and assuming a mortality benefit similar to past volume-outcome stud-
                    regional referral centers, such as low-tidal-volume ventilation for acute   ies resulted in a significant number of lives saved, with only 15.7 patients
                    lung injury,  daily interruption of continuous sedative infusions,  and   needed to transfer in order to prevent one death. Transfer distances were
                                                                   22
                            21
                    ECMO for severe acute respiratory failure. 23         relatively small for most patients, especially those located in urban areas,




            Section01.indd   63                                                                                        1/22/2015   9:37:07 AM
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100