Page 88 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 88

62   Chapter 3.  Stress

                   This prolonged experience of stress can significantly
           lower the immune functioning and the lower levels of vari-
           ous inflammatory cytokines and enzymes that are influential
           in tissue repair (Upton   2011a ,  b ), and in the case of wound
           care, delayed wound healing. Such changes in cytokine and
           enzyme levels could explain the relationship between
           reduced wound healing and stress (Marucha et al.   1998 ).
           Physiologically, prolonged stress can lead to raised levels of
           the hormone cortisol. Although stress isn’t the only reason
           that cortisol is secreted into the bloodstream, it has been
           termed “the stress hormone” because it is secreted in higher
           levels during the body’s ‘fight or flight’ response to stress
           (Ebrecht et al.   2004 ). Higher and more prolonged levels of
           cortisol in the bloodstream have been shown to have nega-
           tive effects on the body including, increased heart rate,
           higher blood pressure and lowered immunity and inflamma-
           tory responses in the body.
               Psychologically, stress can increase the likelihood of
           patients making cognitive errors or negative appraisals, for
           example perceiving a dressing removal as an unpleasant
           experience, which can result in detrimental effects to the
           wound healing process and/or avoidance of treatment. Thus
           negative emotional responses affect biological and behav-
           ioural responses which feed back to further negatively affect
           the emotional response to pain, producing a continuous cycle
           (Adams et al.   2006 ) with delayed wound healing as a conse-
           quence. It is important for clinicians to recognise that pain
           and stress are both comprised of complex interactions
           between physiological, psychological and social factors (see
           Table   3.1 ).
                   Although the GAS model provided an insight into the
           physiological stress process, it regards the individual as
           responding to a stressor, with stress being a linear stimulus-
           response framework. In doing so it ignores the role of psy-
           chological factors and individual differences. Hence, Lazarus
           and Folkman (  1984 ,   1987 ) developed an alternative model
           that integrated the potential for psychological variables: the
           interactional model of stress.
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93