Page 1339 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1339

Chapter 72  Mast Cells and Mastocytosis  1185


              The median OS for all patients at 3 years was 57%, consisting of   least  12  weeks.  The  criteria  for  stable  disease,  PD,  and  loss  of
            74% for patients with SM-AHN, and 43% and 17% for ASM and   response were also detailed in the report.
            MCL patients, respectively. The strongest risk factor for a poor OS
            was a diagnosis of MCL. In addition, inferior survival was observed
            in patients undergoing reduced-intensity versus fully myeloablative   FUTURE DIRECTIONS
            conditioning. However, patient age, donor age, donor type (sibling
            or  unrelated  donor),  graft  source  (BM  or  peripheral  HSCT,  KIT   Several clinical and translational initiatives are being pursued in MC
            mutation  status,  karyotype),  and  total-body  irradiation  used  in   disease and should reach fruition in the near future. Given the relatively
            myeloablative conditioning had no impact on overall or progression-  low incidence of SM, efforts are currently being led by the ECNM to
            free survival. Treatment-related mortality at 6 months and 1 year was   combine patient data from multiple collaborators into a central registry
            11%  and  20%,  respectively,  and  was  highest  in  MCL  patients.   (e.g., such data should be useful in generating prognostic variables to
            Although  a  prospective  trial  is  needed  to  better  define  the  role  of   help risk stratify patient outcomes). Efforts are also underway to vali-
            HSCT in advanced SM, these data suggest that transplantation can   date SM-specific patient-reported outcome tools to qualitatively and
            provide extended survival in selected patients, particularly for patients   quantitatively measure patients’ symptom burden and quality of life.
            with SM-AHN.                                          Regulatory health agencies are increasingly focused on these patient
                                                                  measures for drug approval, and validated patient-reported outcomes
                                                                  are critical for stringent adjudication of treatment-related changes in
            Response Criteria for Advanced SM                     the context of placebo-controlled, double-blind study designs.
                                                                    Clinical trials are under development to investigate targets and
            Response criteria for advanced SM were first published in 2003 and   pathways  relevant  to  MC  pathobiology.  Novel  approaches  include
                                                  5
            reiterated in a consensus conference report in 2007.  In this system,   use  of  the  anti-CD30  antibody-drug  immunoconjugate  brentux-
            evaluation of clinical evidence of organ damage, or “C” findings, was   imab  vedotin,  JAK  inhibitors  (e.g.,  ruxolitinib),  PI3K  inhibitors,
            the foundation for distinguishing levels of response. Changes in BM   and  BTK  inhibitors  such  as  ibrutinib.  In  addition,  new  selective
            MC  burden,  serum  tryptase  level,  and  hepatosplenomegaly  were   inhibitors  of  KIT  D816V  entered  phase  I  trials  in  2016.  Other
            additionally employed to subcategorize levels of MR. These original   agents that merit investigation include inhibitors of BCL-2, agonist
            criteria  or  their  modified  version  have  been  used  to  adjudicate   antibodies against inhibitory receptors such as siglec-8 in order to
            responses in clinical trials of new agents.           induce MC apoptosis, and antibodies against other newly described
              According to prior consensus response criteria, a MR is defined   aberrant  markers  on  neoplastic  MCs,  such  as  CD123  (IL-3
            as normalization of one or more “C” findings. In turn, MR is divided   receptor-α).  Biologic  correlates  of  therapeutic  response  such  as
            into three subcategories: (1) complete remission (resolution of abnor-  changes in KIT mutant allele burden, circulating tumor DNA, and
            mal MC infiltrates in organs, decrease of serum tryptase below 20 ng/  cytokine profiles are now being incorporated into trials. Transcrip-
            mL, and disappearance of SM-associated organomegaly); (2) incom-  tome and proteomic profiling of purified MCs and AHN cell popu-
            plete  remission  (decrease  of  MC  infiltrates  and/or  serum  tryptase   lations are compelling translational objectives for future protocols.
            level, and/or visible regression of organomegaly by >50%), and (3)
            pure  clinical  response  (without  decrease  of  MC  infiltrates,  serum
            tryptase  level,  or  organomegaly).  A  PR  is  defined  as  incomplete   REFERENCES
            regression of one or more “C” findings (good PR; >50% regression
            of one or more “C” findings; and minor response, ≤50% regression).   1.  Ehrlich P: Beitrage zur theorie und praxis der histologischen färbung [thesis],
            Progression of one or more “C” findings even in the presence of an   Leipzig, Germany, 1878, University of Leipzig.
            improvement of other “C” findings defines PD.          2.  Metcalfe DD: Mast cells and mastocytosis. Blood 112(4):946–956, 2008.
              Several shortcomings emerged regarding these SM response crite-  3.  Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, et al: Diagnostic criteria and classifica-
            ria.  First,  achievement  of  an  “MR”  is  permitted  in  patients  with   tion  of  mastocytosis:  a  consensus  proposal.  Leuk  Res  25(7):603–625,
            baseline laboratory values just outside of the normal reference range.   2001.
            Second, responses in C-findings such as ascites, weight loss, and bone   4.  Horny HP, Akin C, Metcalfe DD, et al: Mastocytosis. In Swerdlow SH,
            lesions are often difficult to quantify. Third, criteria for baseline red   Campo  E,  Harris  NL,  et al,  editors:  WHO  Classification  of Tumors  of
            blood  cell  and  platelet  transfusion  dependence  were  not  codified.   Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Lyon, 2008, International Agency
            Lastly,  the  minimal  DOR  was  not  clearly  defined,  although  a   for Research and Cancer (IARC), pp 54–63.
            minimum response duration of 8 weeks has been incorporated ad hoc   5.  Valent P, Akin C, Escribano L, et al: Standards and standardization in
            into many trials.                                        mastocytosis:  consensus  statements  on  diagnostics,  treatment  recom-
              In order to overcome these challenges, and to generate response   mendations and response criteria. Eur J Clin Invest 37(6):435–453, 2007.
            criteria that can be adopted across clinical trials, the International   6.  Agis H, Willheim M, Sperr WR, et al: Monocytes do not make mast
            Working  Group  for  Myeloproliferative  Neoplasms  Research  and   cells  when  cultured  in  the  presence  of  SCF.  Characterization  of  the
            Treatment  (IWG-MRT)  and  the  ECNM  established  revised   circulating mast cell progenitor as a c-kit+, CD34+, Ly-, CD14-, CD17-,
            response criteria for advanced SM that better characterize nonhema-  colony-forming cell. J Immunol 151(8):4221–4227, 1993.
            tologic  and  hematologic  organ  damage  findings,  and  lend  more   7.  Reilly JT: Class III receptor tyrosine kinases: role in leukaemogenesis.
            specificity and quantitation to evaluation of clinical and histopatho-  Br J Haematol 116(4):744–757, 2002.
                          30
            logic  improvement.   First,  a  minimum  of  grade  2  (according  to   8.  Gotlib J, Akin C: Mast cells and eosinophils in mastocytosis, chronic
            NCI Common Terminology Criteria version 4.03) hematologic or   eosinophilic  leukemia,  and  non-clonal  disorders.  Semin  Hematol
            nonhematologic organ damage was required to be considered eligible   49(2):128–137, 2012.
            for organ damage adjudication. Resolution of one or more nonhe-  9.  Gilfillan AM, Rivera J: The tyrosine kinase network regulating mast cell
            matologic or hematologic organ damage findings without concomi-  activation. Immunol Rev 228(1):149–169, 2009.
            tant  worsening  of  other  eligible  organ  damage  was  defined  as   10.  Saleh R, Wedeh G, Herrmann H, et al: A new human mast cell line
            “clinical  improvement”  (CI).  Response  categories  of  CR  and  PR   expressing a functional IgE receptor converts to tumorigenic growth by
            were defined based on the percent reduction of (1) the burden of   KIT D816V transfection. Blood 124(1):111–120, 2014.
            neoplastic MCs in the BM (and/or extracutaneous organ) and (2)   11.  Lim  KH,  Tefferi  A,  Lasho  TL,  et al:  Systemic  mastocytosis  in  342
            the serum tryptase level. In addition to changes in MC burden and   consecutive  adults:  survival  studies  and  prognostic  factors.  Blood
            serum  tryptase  level,  achievement  of  a  PR  or  CR  requires  that   113(23):5727–5736, 2009.
            patients  also  meet  criteria  for  resolution  of  at  least  one  or  all  CI   12.  Pardanani A, Lim KH, Lasho TL, et al: Prognostically relevant break-
            findings, respectively. For additional clinical relevance, the duration   down of 123 patients with systemic mastocytosis associated with other
            of  CI  and  histopathologic  response  need  to  be  maintained  for  at   myeloid malignancies. Blood 114(18):3769–3772, 2009.
   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   1343   1344