Page 2320 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 2320

2062   Part XII  Hemostasis and Thrombosis


        DDAVP,  which  promotes  release  of  stored  VWF  and  raises  levels   Dosing  recommendations  are  provided  either  in  VWF : RCo
        3–10-fold. Peak effects are achieved 30 and 90 minutes after intra-  (North America) or FVIII : C (Europe) units and are weight-based;
        venous  and  intranasal  delivery,  respectively.  The  usual  parenteral   repeat infusions can be given every 8 to 24 hours, depending on the
        dose is 0.3 µg/kg infused intravenously in approximately 50 mL of   clinical situation. The goal is to maintain VWF : RCo and FVIII : C
        normal saline over approximately 30 minutes. The dose of the highly   at  more  than  100 IU/dL  at  peak  and  at  more  than  50 IU/dL  at
        concentrated  intranasal  preparation  is  150 µg  for  children  under   trough until hemostasis is achieved. With VWF/FVIII concentrates,
        50 kg  and  300 µg  for  larger  children  and  adults.  It  is  important   the FVIII : C response is higher and more sustained than predicted
        to  note  that  highly  concentrated  products  (e.g.,  Stimate)  deliver   from the dose because of the stabilizing effect of exogenous VWF on
        150 µg per spray, a much higher concentration than that used to treat   endogenous  FVIII.  Details  regarding  dosing  can  be  found  in  the
        enuresis.                                             product inserts. VWF : RCo and FVIII : C levels should be measured
           After VWD diagnosis, a DDAVP challenge is advisable to assess   in patients receiving repeat infusions, not only to ensure adequate
        VWF response. VWF and FVIII levels should be determined before   hemostasis but also to monitor for supraphysiological levels of FVIII
        and at several points after DDAVP administration (e.g., at baseline   because thromboembolic events have been associated with high FVIII
        and at 1 and 4 hours). A threefold increase in VWF and FVIII levels   levels. The overall incidence of thrombotic events is very low, and
        to at least 0.30 IU/mL (30%) is usually considered adequate for situ-  most  cases  occurred  in  surgical  patients  with  other  risk  factors.
        ations such as dental procedures, minor surgery, or the treatment of   Therefore mechanical and anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis should
        epistaxis or menorrhagia.                             be  considered  on  a  case-by-case  basis.  Adverse  reactions  to VWF/
           DDAVP is safe and generally well tolerated. Common side effects   FVIII  concentrates  are  rare  but  include  allergic  and  anaphylactic
        include facial flushing and headache. Tachycardia, lightheadedness,   symptoms,  such  as  urticaria,  chest  tightness,  rash,  pruritus,  and
        and mild hypotension can occur. The most serious side effects are   edema.
        severe hyponatremia and seizures. Reduction of fluid intake for 24   VWF : FVIII concentrates are effective in over 97% of events. In
        hours  after  DDAVP  administration  is  an  important  precaution  to   the rare event that infusion of a VWF/FVIII concentrate is ineffective
        prevent water intoxication. Serum sodium levels should be monitored   at  stopping  bleeding,  transfusion  of  platelet  concentrates  may  be
        in patients receiving repeated doses of DDAVP. In addition, DDAVP   beneficial,  presumably  because  they  facilitate  the  delivery  of  small
        should be used with caution in those younger than 2 years of age   amounts of platelet VWF to the site of vascular injury.
        because of a higher risk for hyponatremia. There are case reports of   A new recombinant VWF (rvWF) concentrate, which is admin-
        DDAVP precipitating coronary artery vasospasm and acute myocar-  istered  with  recombinant  FVIII  in  a  1.3  RCo : FVIII  ratio,  has
        dial infarction. Therefore DDAVP should be used with caution in   recently been studied in a prospective phase 1 randomized clinical
        patients with a history of coronary artery disease or in the older adult.   trial. The trial demonstrated safety, tolerability, and a pharmacoki-
        In  persons  who  are  intolerant  to  DDAVP  or  have  a  poor  VWF   netic profile comparable to that with plasma-derived VWF concen-
        response, clotting factor concentrate is required.    trates. Larger clinical studies are needed and are ongoing, but rvWF
           An important limitation in the use of DDAVP is the development   represents an important advance in the treatment options for VWD.
        of tachyphylaxis with repeated administration. When given repeat-
        edly at intervals of less than 24 hours, the magnitude of the VWF
        and FVIII increments can fall to approximately 70% of those obtained   Prophylaxis
        with the initial dose. For practical purposes, a single dose of DDAVP
        before dental extractions or minor procedures is usually sufficient.   Short-term  prophylaxis  with  a  combination  of  an  antifibrinolytic,
        Although repeated doses can be given at 12 or 24 hours, the potential   DDAVP,  and/or  VWF/FVIII  concentrates,  in  anticipation  of  a
        for  tachyphylaxis  must  be  considered.  Additionally,  in  situations   defined bleeding challenge, such as surgery, is the standard of care in
        where repeat dosing is considered, more prolonged fluid restriction   the treatment of VWD. The role of long-term continuous prophy-
        is required.                                          laxis, defined as primary if initiated before long-term sequelae have
           Although  most  type  1  VWD  patients  respond  adequately  to   developed  (e.g.,  joint  damage)  or  secondary  if  initiated  after  the
        DDAVP, type 3 VWD patients typically do not respond to this drug,   development of chronic changes, is less established in VWD than it
        and the response in type 2 VWD patients is variable. Type 2A patients   is in severe hemophilia. Individuals with severe cases of VWD, in
        often exhibit an adequate response and may benefit from a DDAVP   particular type 3 VWD and certain patients with severe type 1 or
        trial. Type  2M  patients  typically  do  not  respond  well  to  DDAVP.   type 2 VWD, may experience recurrent joint bleeds, as well as severe
        DDAVP is generally contraindicated in type 2B VWD because of the   and frequently recurrent nasal/oral, GI, or menstrual bleeding. The
        transient thrombocytopenia that accompanies the release of mutant   resultant anemia, hospitalizations, and absences from school or work
        VWF. In type 2N VWD, DDAVP produces a two-fold to ninefold   may have a significant impact on quality of life. Although there is
        increase in FVIII, but the increase persists for approximately 3 hours.   limited evidence, several cohort and case studies suggest that both
        Therefore  DDAVP  should  be  reserved  for  situations  in  which  a   primary and secondary long-term prophylaxis improve quality of life,
        transient rise in FVIII is sufficient.                alleviate anemia, reduce hospitalizations, and prevent chronic joint
                                                              disease.  Complications  are  unusual  aside  from  rare  cases  of  VWF
                                                              inhibitor  formation  (approximately  3%).  Controversy  exists  about
        von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII Concentrates        the specific indications, schedules, and dosing of prophylactic regi-
                                                              mens. This is the subject of an ongoing international trial, known as
        VWF/FVIII concentrates are required for patients who do not have   the VWD International Prophylaxis trial, which began recruitment
        an adequate response, experience side effects, or have contraindica-  of patients in 2007.
        tions to DDAVP. Because of tachyphylaxis and the risk of hypona-
        tremia with DDAVP, patients with severe bleeding or those requiring
        major  or  repeated  surgery  often  need  VWF  replacement  therapy.   Pediatric Issues
        Purified, viral-inactivated, plasma-derived VWF/FVIII is the product
        most frequently used (e.g., Humate-P, Wilate). The quantity of ris-  Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk (generally only for
        tocetin cofactor activity (VWF : RCo) relative to FVIII : C varies by   type 3 VWD) is possible by analysis of DNA extracted from fetal
        product; Humate-P contains 2.4 VWF : RCo units for each 1 FVIII : C   cells obtained by chorionic villus sampling at 11–13 weeks of gesta-
        unit, whereas Wilate contains a 1 : 1 ratio. Both products contain a   tion  or  amniocentesis  at  15–18  weeks  of  gestation.  The  disease-
        full spectrum of VWF multimers, including HMW multimers, and   causing  allele(s)  of  an  affected  family  member  must  be  identified
        closely resemble normal plasma. Highly purified FVIII concentrates   before  prenatal  testing.  Preimplantation  genetic  diagnosis  may  be
        (monoclonal antibody purified and recombinant) should not be used   available for families in which the disease-causing mutation(s) have
        to treat VWD because they lack VWF.                   been identified.
   2315   2316   2317   2318   2319   2320   2321   2322   2323   2324   2325