Page 310 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 310

284  Part IV:  Molecular and Cellular Hematology                   Chapter 19:  The Inflammatory Response             285




                  sensorium, and the production of fibrinogen, serum amyloid protein,   ineffective. Chemokine decoy receptors can also be derived in situ from
                  C3,  C4,  and  C-reactive  protein  by  hepatocytes  and  other  cell  types.   previously active receptors in sites of inflammation. IL-10 facilitates
                  The biochemical fingerprints of an acute-phase response are revealed   maintenance of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 expression, but induces the
                  through several widely available laboratory tests (C-reactive protein   functional inactivity of these receptors thus hastening the resolution of
                  measurement, serum protein electrophoresis). Severe, overwhelming   inflammation.
                  infections attended by high serum concentrations of endotoxin can
                                                             4
                  induce very high concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.  High con-  NEUTROPHIL APOPTOSIS
                  centrations of TNF-α are directly responsible for several of the key man-
                  ifestations of severe sepsis and septic shock (e.g., cardiac suppression,   Contrary to a long-held belief that extravascular neutrophil life spans
                  intravascular thrombosis, capillary leakage and insulin resistance). 3,4  are fixed, recent studies suggest that neutrophil life spans can be mod-
                                                                                           5
                     Interruption of TNF-α has been a therapeutic strategy in localized   ulated by local mediators.  Low concentrations of macrophage-derived
                  inflammatory conditions like the joint inflammation (and destruction)   TNF-α and Fas-ligand prolong neutrophil life span, whereas high con-
                                                                                                                    5
                  of rheumatoid arthritis and bowel wall inflammation in Crohn disease   centrations of the same ligands lead to shortened life spans.  The latter
                                                               30
                  and ulcerative colitis, as well as in severe sepsis and septic shock.  Anti–  results in neutrophil apoptosis via phosphoinositide 3-kinase–triggered
                  TNF-α therapy (via engineered monoclonal antibodies [infliximab and   oxygen metabolite generation and Btk-NADPH–modulated pathways.
                  adalimumab] that neutralize TNF-α as well as inhibitory soluble TNF   Other local regulators of neutrophil apoptosis include oxygen tension-
                  receptors [etanercept]) has been effective in conditions such as rheu-  modulated hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and granulocyte-macrophage
                  matoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, but not in severe sep-  colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). 5
                  sis or septic shock in humans.  Major adverse events associated with   In turn, apoptotic neutrophils attenuate inflammation via the
                                        4,30
                  anti–TNF-α therapies include an increased risk of mycobacterial infec-  secretion of annexin A1, which inhibits the recruitment of additional
                  tion, development of autoantibodies (but not autoimmune disease),   neutrophils as well enhances neutrophil apoptosis and phagocytosis by
                                                                                  5
                                         30
                  and injection site inflammation.  There have been isolated reports of   macrophages.  Lactoferrin, a neutrophil secondary granule protein, also
                  cytopenias, skin cancer and worsened congestive heart failure. 30  inhibits neutrophil recruitment and induces apoptosis following its release
                                                                        into the inflammatory milieu. (The effect of lactoferrin on neutrophil sur-
                                                                        vival is influenced by its degree of iron saturation.) Macrophage inges-
                     RESOLUTION OF INFLAMMATION                         tion of apoptotic neutrophils is called “efferocytosis,” a process directed
                                                                        by distinct “find me” and “eat me” signals.  “Find me” signals include the
                                                                                                      5
                  Since the advent of morphologic examinations of tissue from inflamma-  nucleotides ATP and uridine triphosphate (UTP), fractalkine (CX CL1),
                                                                                                                       3
                  tory lesions, it has been recognized that resolution of acute inflamma-  lysophosphatidylcholine and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S-1-P). The cor-
                  tion is marked by the disappearance of neutrophils and the engulfment   responding counterreceptors for these “find me” signals include P2Y2
                  of cellular debris by recruited monocytes and tissue macrophages.   receptors, CX CR1, G2A, and S-1-P  receptors, respectively. This set of
                                                                                                  1–5
                                                                                  3
                  It has been relatively recent that resolution of inflammation has been   “find me/eat me” ligand receptor pairs fits within a larger set of apoptotic
                                           5
                  understood to be an active process.  Key aspects of resolution include:   cell-efferocyte interactions. In some cases, apoptotic cell “find me” mol-
                  (1) cessation of neutrophil influx effected by chemokine inactivation   ecules are expressed as a function of apoptosis per se, whereas in other
                  and sequestration; (2) neutrophil apoptosis; (3) functional polariza-  cases, existing surface molecules are either modified or linked with medi-
                  tion or switching of macrophages from a proinflammatory (M1) to a   ators that facilitate recognition and ingestion by efferocytes.
                  wound-healing and tissue-remodeling (M2) phenotype; and (4) the
                  rapid, localized generation of proresolution lipid mediators that include
                  lipoxins, resolvins, and protectins. 5                M1 AND M2 MACROPHAGES
                                                                        It was recognized during the 1980s and 1990s that various cytokines
                                                                                                               5
                  INACTIVATION AND SEQUESTRATION                        can  differentially  modulate  macrophage  function.   From  original
                  OF CHEMOKINES                                         specific observations of an IFN-γ–activated macrophage phenotype
                                                                        and an IL-4–activated macrophage phenotype, emerged the concept
                  As described in the preceding section, neutrophil influx into an inflam-  of  “classical,  IFN-γ–activated,  M1”  macrophages  and  “alternative,
                                                                                                  5
                  matory site is in part mediated by locally generated chemokines. The   IL-4–activated, M2” macrophages.  Such macrophages are sometimes
                  actions of proinflammatory chemokines are terminated as a result of   described as being “polarized” by IFN-γ, IL-4, or other mediators. Sev-
                  their  cleavage  into  inactive  fragments  and  through  sequestration  or   eral different activated macrophage “phenotype signatures” have been
                  removal from participation by binding to indigenous nonfunctional   elucidated, a recognition that has led to a series of designations with
                  decoy receptors or to  locally generated decoy receptors. Examples   “M1” and “M2” representing the most extreme differences.  There are
                                                                                                                    5
                                                                                        5
                  include the cleavage of neutrophil-directed CXC-chemokines within   several M2 subtypes.  IFN-γ–activated macrophages (M1) produce
                  a critical ELR motif by macrophage-derived matrix metalloproteinase   tissue-toxic radicals (e.g., NO) and proinflammatory cytokines (e.g.,
                  12 and matrix metalloproteinase cleavage of the monocyte-directed   TNF-α), whereas M2 macrophages produce less NO and more IL-10
                  CC-chemokine, CCL7.  Cleaved CCL7 can still bind its cognate recep-  and TGF-β, the latter being important mediators of wound healing and/
                                  5,31
                                                                                        5
                  tors, CCR1, CCR2, and CCR3, but these cells are not mobilized by the   or tissue-remodeling.  Insight into the role of tissue macrophages in the
                  truncated version of CCL7. 5                          resolution of active inflammation and the transition to wound-healing
                     Chemokine receptors  that  lack  an  intact highly-conserved DRY   and tissue-remodeling has helped foster the concept of inflammation as
                  motif, which normally links the receptor to key signal transduction   an actively regulated response.
                  molecules, function as decoy receptors. The best understood of these are
                                                              5
                  the “Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines” (DARC) and D6.  DARC is   LIPID REGULATORS: RESOLVINS
                  expressed by endothelial cells at sites of leukocyte egress and binds both
                  CC and CXC chemokines. Functional studies reveal that disruption of   AND PROTECTINS
                  DARC leads to increased neutrophil recruitment into sites of inflamma-  The  transition  from  peak  acute  inflammation,  marked  by  maximum
                  tion. D6 binds several different CC chemokines, thus rendering them   concentrations of neutrophils, toward resolution, is accompanied by






          Kaushansky_chapter 19_p0279-0292.indd   285                                                                   9/17/15   5:51 PM
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315