Page 420 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 420

CHAPTER 21  Nola J. Pender  401

                                                         model identifies concepts relevant to health-promoting
            Use of Empirical Evidence                    behaviors  and  facilitates  the  generation  of  testable
           The  HPM,  as  depicted  in  Figure  21–1,  served  as  a   hypotheses (Pender, Murdaugh, & Parsons, 2002).
           framework  for  research  aimed  at  predicting  overall   The HPM provides a paradigm for the develop-
           health-promoting  lifestyles  and  specific  behaviors   ment  of  instruments.  The  Health  Promoting  Life-
           such as exercise and use of hearing protection (Pender,   style Profile and the Exercise Benefits-Barriers Scale
           1987).  Pender  and  colleagues  conducted  a  program   (EBBS)  are  two  examples.*  These  instruments
           of research funded by the National Institute of Nurs-  serve to test the model and support further model
           ing  Research  to  evaluate  the  HPM  in  the  following   development.
           populations:  (1)  working  adults,  (2)  older  commu-  The  purpose  of  the  Health  Promotion  Lifestyle
           nity-dwelling  adults,  (3)  ambulatory  patients  with   Profile  instrument  is  to  measure  health-promoting
           cancer, and (4) patients undergoing cardiac rehabili-  lifestyle  (Pender,  1996).  The  Health  Promotion  Life-
           tation. These studies tested the validity of the HPM   style Profile II (HPLP-II), is a revision of the original
           (Pender, personal communication, May 24, 2000). A   instrument  for  research.   The  52-item,  four-point,
                                                                             †
           summary of findings from earlier studies is included   Likert-style  instrument  has  six  subscales:  (1)  health
           in the 1996 edition of  Health  Promotion  in  Nursing   responsibility,  (2)  physical  activity,  (3)  nutrition,
           Practice  (Pender,  1996).  Studies  further  testing  the   (4)  interpersonal  relations,  (5)  spiritual  growth,  and
           model  are  discussed  in  the  fifth  edition  of  Health   (6) stress management. The mean can be derived for
           Promotion in Nursing Practice (Pender, Murdaugh, &   each subscale, or a total mean signifying overall health-
           Parsons, 2006). The fifth edition includes an emphasis   promoting lifestyle (Walker, Sechrist, & Pender, 1987).
           on  the  HPM  as  applied  to  diverse  and  vulnerable   The  instrument  provides  assessment  of  a  health-
           populations and addresses evidence-based practice.  promoting lifestyle of individuals and is used clinically
             The rationale for revision of the HPM stemmed   by nurses for patient support and education.
           from the research. The process of refining the HPM,   The  HPM  identifies  cognitive  and  perceptual
           as  published  in  1987,  led  to  several  changes  in  the   factors  as  major  determinants  of  health-promoting
           model  (see  Figure  21–1)  (Pender,  1996).  First,  im-  behavior.  The  EBBS  measures  the  cognitive  and
           portance of health, perceived control of health, and   perceptual factors of perceived benefits and perceived
           cues  for  action  were  deleted.  Second,  definition  of   barriers  to  exercise  (Sechrist,  Walker,  &  Pender,
           health,  perceived  health  status,  and  demographic    1987). The 43-item, four-point, Likert-styled instru-
           and  biological  characteristics  were  repositioned  as   ment consists of a 29-item benefits scale and a 14-item
           personal  factors  in  the  1996  revision  of  the  HPM   barriers scale that may be scored separately or as a
           (Pender, 1996) and the fourth edition of Health Pro-  whole.  The  higher  the  overall  score  on  the  43-item
           motion  in  Nursing  Practice  (Pender,  Murdaugh,  &   instrument,  the  more  positively  the  individual  per-
           Parsons,  2002)  (Figure  21–2).  Third,  the  revised   ceives the benefits to exercise in relation to barriers to
           HPM  (see  Figure  21–2)  added  three  new  variables   exercise (Sechrist, Walker, & Pender, 1987). The EBBS
           that  influenced  the  individual  to  engage  in  health-  is useful clinically for evaluating exercise perceptions.
           promoting behaviors (Pender, 1996):
           •  Activity-related affect
           •  Commitment to a plan of action              Major Assumptions
           •  Immediate competing demand and preferences  The  assumptions  reflect  the  behavioral  science
             The revised HPM focuses on 10 categories of deter-  perspective  and  emphasize  the  active  role  of  the
           minants  of  health-promoting  behavior.  The  revised   patient in managing health behaviors by modifying




           *The EBBS can be obtained from the Health Promotion Research Program, Social Science Research Institute, Northern Illinois
           University, DeKalb, IL 60115.
           † The HPLP-II can be obtained through the faculty-staff profile for Dr. Susan Noble Walker, EdD, RN, at the College of Nursing,
           University of Nebraska Medical Center. http://www.unmc.edu/nursing/Health_Promoting_Lifestyle_Profile_II.htm
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425