Page 45 - Towards_a_New_Malaysia_The_2018_Election_and_Its_6146371_(z-lib.org)
P. 45

30                                        Ibrahim Su an and Lee Tai De

                  Voting Patterns in Sarawak

                  BN Sarawak was con dent of retaining its parliamentary districts (and also
                  winning back a few more districts from the opposition) in Sarawak leading
                  up to GE14 (Dayak Daily 2017). Our conversations with researchers tasked
                  with soliciting voter-feedback as the election approached found that they
                  assumed only four urban districts then held by the DAP would be out of BN’s
                  reach. Merdeka Center did not conduct any surveys speci cally in Sarawak
                  in the lead-up to the election. However, as the counting of the ballots began
                  in the early evening of 9 May, it became apparent that voters in a number of
                  districts previously deemed safe had voted for PH or prominent independent
                  candidates.  e BN’s loss of 12 districts in Sarawak and 15 in Sabah led
                  directly to BN’s capitulation as the federal ruling party.
                     In the wake of the election, BN Sarawak, comprising Parti Pesaka
                  Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS), Progressive
                  Democratic Party (PDP), and Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP), left
                  the coalition and formed their own coalition called Gabungan Parti Sarawak
                  (GPS, Coalition of Sarawak Parties). In terms of overall performance, GPS
                  (previously BN Sarawak) lost about 6.4 per cent of the popular vote compared
                  to its performance in GE13, declining from 58.9 per cent attained in 2013 to
                  52.5 per cent in 2018.
                     As noted above, the electorate in Sarawak has been found to vote along
                  ethnic lines, as elsewhere in Malaysia. In the past several decades, the political
                  dichotomy in Sarawak has been drawn between Bumiputera and Chinese
                  voters.  e former have tended overwhelmingly to support BN, while sizable
                  majorities of the latter have been supporting DAP and Pakatan since 2006.
                   e division of Sarawak parliamentary constituencies by voters’ ethnic
                  backgrounds is given in Table 2.11.
                     In GE14, however, a clear schism within the Bumiputera block of voters
                  became evident—Melanau and Malay voters remained steadfast in their support
                  for BN Sarawak (now GPS), while other largely non-Muslim Bumiputera,
                  such as the Bidayuh, Iban, and Orang Ulu communities, all registered sizable
                  declines in their support for GPS/BN Sarawak.  is rift explains why the PH
                  parties were able to double their gains, from only 6 districts in GE13 to 12 in
                  GE14.
                     In order to work out these shifts in voting patterns, we compared the
                  GE14 results with those from Sarawak’s most recent state election, in 2016.
                                                                                 7
                  To put this election into context, the 2016 state election was held under the
                  popular chief minister, the late Adenan Satem, who campaigned on a platform
                  of Sarawak exclusivity and autonomy. Support for BN soared then, showing





                        This content downloaded from 139.80.253.0 on Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:21:47 UTC
                                   All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50