Page 966 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 966

C H A P T E R          57 

                                      PHARMACOLOGY AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF 

                         ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS FOR HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES


                        Stanton L. Gerson, Paolo F. Caimi, Basem M. William, and Richard J. Creger





            The treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies has been   AKT  activation;  disruption  of  replication  sequences;  loss  of  DNA
            revolutionized over the past decades as new therapeutic targets con-  repair  enzymes  such  as  mismatch  repair  (MMR)  enzymes;  loss  of
            tinue to be identified through cellular and molecular studies of these   proper  homologous  recombination  from  a  defect  in  the  BRCA–
            conditions. These investigations have spawned the discovery, clinical   Fanconi pathways; and loss of ATM/ATR kinases, which can give rise
            evaluation, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval   to chromosomal recombination, loss, and microsatellite instability,
            of new mechanistic-based therapeutic agents. A surprising number of   and  loss  of  checkpoint  regulation.  These  events  can  give  rise  to
            these agents have progressed from the discovery phases to validation,   intraclonal emergent point mutations, translocations, and intragenic
            animal modeling, and successful clinical testing. The results have led   losses that might not only result in malignant transformation, but
            to  a  virtual  explosion  in  the  therapeutic  armamentarium  and  an   also lead to disruption of genomic stability and selection in favor of
            increase in the spectrum of drugs including small molecules, mono-  proliferative  and  apoptosis-resistant  subclones.  Leukemic  clonal
            clonal antibodies, radiolabeled antibodies, drug immunoconjugates,   evolution favors drug resistance.
            immunotoxins, and complex delivery systems. This chapter provides   Common mechanisms may be involved in events associated with
            information on new and existing therapeutic agents available for the   malignant  transformation  and  the  development  of  mutations  that
            treatment  of  patients  with  hematologic  malignancies. The  chapter   result in tumor heterogeneity. For example, the cell cycle checkpoint
            reviews the “classic” agents as well as the newly developed, target-  and tumor suppressor gene, TP53, is induced during DNA damage,
            based  agents.  Both  cytotoxic  and  growth-inhibitory  agents  are   leading to G 1  arrest and, if the damage is too severe to repair, cell
            covered;  however,  the  use  of  therapeutic  antibodies  and  antibody   death by apoptosis occurs. The presumed goal of this process is to
            conjugates  is  reviewed  within  the  chapters  dealing  with  specific   eliminate  cells  that  develop  deleterious  mutations  as  a  result  of
            diseases.                                             damage to the genome. Loss of TP53 may not only increase cellular
                                                                  survival by inhibiting the cell death process, but may also promote
            TUMOR CELL HETEROGENEITY OF HEMATOLOGIC               the transmission of mutations that would otherwise be deleted. In
                                                                  this manner, a defect of the cell death pathway can have multiple
            MALIGNANCIES                                          consequences,  including  (1)  selection  of  cells  exhibiting  a  growth
                                                                  advantage over their normal counterparts, (2) development of drug
            Whereas hematologic malignancies are of clonal origin (i.e., they are   resistance, and (3) promotion of mutations that result in either (1)
            derived  from  a  single  transformed  cell),  individual  neoplastic  cells   or (2), as well as neoplastic cell heterogeneity. Age-dependent changes
            from a patient’s malignancy exhibit a great deal of phenotypic diver-  in these processes may explain the more favorable behavior of leuke-
            sity and acquire secondary mutations that affect proliferation, drug   mias and lymphomas in response to chemotherapy in young patients
            sensitivity, and resistance. This diversity likely arises from the progeny   than older patients.
            of clonal populations and subsets of stem cells. In animal models, it   A  model  of  the  relationship  between  tumor  growth  rate,  the
            has been shown that the clones themselves can give rise to progeny   occurrence of spontaneous mutations, and the development of drug
            that  can  transmit  the  clonal  malignancy  after  transplantation  into   resistance was first described by Goldie and Coldman and is referred
            secondary recipients, suggesting that stem cells are not required to   to as the Goldie and Coldman hypothesis. In this model, the size of
            transmit the malignant phenotype.                     a tumor depends on a complex interaction between tumor growth
              New evidence indicates that leukemia stem cells are more quies-  rate  and  cell  loss,  the  latter  stemming  from  the  status  of  the  cell
            cent, have higher levels of protective proteins such as efflux pumps   death  process,  exhaustion  of  available  nutrients,  and  outstripping
            for drugs, and have higher levels of DNA repair proteins or antiapop-  of the blood supply. As tumors increase in size, the cell death rate
            totic proteins than the more abundant cell making up the circulating   tends  to  increase.  The  heterogeneous  nature  of  additional  muta-
            population of cells. Tumor cell heterogeneity arises as a consequence   tions  makes  it  likely  that  multiple  mechanisms  of  resistance  will
            of spontaneous mutational events, changes in gene promoter meth-  develop  as  well.  From  an  operational  standpoint,  this  model  has
            ylation,  abnormal  expression  of  transcription  factors,  lymphoid   clear implications for the rational design of therapeutic strategies and
            reactivity, and cytokine responsiveness. For example, a mutation or   provides a basis for early and intensive combination drug therapy.
            change in expression that renders a hematopoietic cell clone autono-  The  successful  implementation  of  this  strategy  is  exemplified  by
            mous  or  growth  factor–independent  would  be  expected  to  render   the  administration  of  dose-intensive  multidrug  regimens  (i.e.,  the
            such cells less susceptible to adverse environmental conditions (e.g.,   BEACOPP [bleomycin, etoposide, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide,
            growth factor withdrawal). Similarly, one would also predict that a   vincristine  (Oncovin)  procarbazine,  and  prednisone]  regimen
            genetic change facilitating cell cycle entry or disruption of cellular   in  Hodgkin  lymphoma,  CODOX-M-IVAC  [cyclophoshamide,
            maturation would ultimately lead to overgrowth of affected clones.   vincristine,  doxorubicin,  high-dose  methotrexate  alternating  with
            For obvious reasons, mutations that interfere with drug metabolism   ifosfamide,  etoposide  and  high-dose  cytarabine]  in  Burkitt  lym-
            or the cell death pathway itself would provide a net survival advan-  phoma  [non-Hodgkin  lymphoma  (NHL)])  and  combinations  of
            tage,  particularly  under  the  selection  pressure  of  cytotoxic  drug   cytotoxic agents with monoclonal antibodies, such as CHOP (cyclo-
            treatment.                                            phosphamide,  hydroxydaunorubicin,  vincristine  [Oncovin],  and
              Malignant myeloid and lymphoid cells have many reasons to have   prednisone)–rituximab,  which  are  potentially  curative  when  given
            increased mutational rates. Genomic instability can arise from dys-  early in the course of the disease. Other examples include combined
            regulation of the cell cycle machinery because of a number of events,   use of multitargeted agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib for
            including perturbations of cyclins leading to MYC overexpression;   myeloma, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab for chronic

                                                                                                                 849
   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971