Page 59 - 9780077418427.pdf
P. 59
/Users/user-f465/Desktop
tiL12214_ch02_025-060.indd Page 36 9/1/10 9:55 PM user-f465
tiL12214_ch02_025-060.indd Page 36 9/1/10 9:55 PM user-f465 /Users/user-f465/Desktop
of air resistance on the feather has been removed. When objects Substituting this equation in the rearranged equation 2.1, the
fall toward Earth without air resistance being considered, they distance relationship becomes
are said to be in free fall. Free fall considers only gravity and _
(
)
neglects air resistance. d = v f + v i (t)
2
Step 3: The initial velocity of a falling object is always zero just
CONCEPTS Applied as it is dropped, so the v i can be eliminated,
v f _
( )
Falling Bodies d = (t)
2
Galileo concluded that all objects fall together, with the
same acceleration, when the upward force of air resistance Step 4: Now you want to get acceleration into the equation in
is removed. It would be most difficult to remove air from place of velocity. This can be done by solving equation 2.2
the room, but it is possible to do some experiments that for the final velocity (v f ), then substituting. The initial
provide some evidence of how air influences falling objects. velocity (v i ) is again eliminated because it equals zero.
1. Take a sheet of paper and your textbook and drop _
v f – v i
them side by side from the same height. Note the a = t
result.
2. Place the sheet of paper on top of the book and drop v f = at
them at the same time. Do they fall together? at _
( )
3. Crumple the sheet of paper into a loose ball, and drop d = (t)
2
the ball and book side by side from the same height.
4. Crumple a sheet of paper into a very tight ball, and Step 5: Simplifying, the equation becomes
again drop the ball and book side by side from the 1 _
same height. d = at 2
2
Explain any evidence you found concerning how
objects fall. equation 2.4
Thus, Galileo reasoned that a freely falling object should cover a
2
distance proportional to the square of the time of the fall (d ∝ t ).
In other words the object should fall 4 times as far in 2 s as in 1 s
2
2
Galileo concluded that light and heavy objects fall together (2 = 4), 9 times as far in 3 s (3 = 9), and so on. Compare this
in free fall, but he also wanted to know the details of what was prediction with Figure 2.12.
going on while they fell. He now knew that the velocity of an ob-
ject in free fall was not proportional to the weight of the object.
He observed that the velocity of an object in free fall increased 4.9 m in 1 s
as the object fell and reasoned from this that the velocity of the
falling object would have to be (1) somehow proportional to
the time of fall and (2) somehow proportional to the distance 19.6 m in 2 s
2
(2 = 4: 4 4.9 = 19.6
the object fell. If the time and distance were both related to the
velocity of a falling object at a given time and distance, how
were they related to each other? To answer this question, Galileo
made calculations involving distance, velocity, and time and, in 44.1 m in 3 s
2
(3 = 9: 9 4.9 = 44.1)
fact, introduced the concept of acceleration. The relationships
between these variables are found in the same three equations
that you have already learned. Let’s see how the equations can be
rearranged to incorporate acceleration, distance, and time for
an object in free fall.
78.4 m in 4 s
Step 1: Equation 2.1 gives a relationship between average (4 = 16: 16 4.9 = 78.4)
2
velocity (v), distance (d), and time (t). Solving this
equation for distance gives
d = vt
Step 2: An object in free fall should have uniformly acceler-
ated motion, so the average velocity could be calcu-
lated from equation 2.3, FIGURE 2.12 An object dropped from a tall building covers
increasing distances with every successive second of falling. The
_ distance covered is proportional to the square of the time of falling
v f + v i
v = 2
2 (d ∝ t ).
36 CHAPTER 2 Motion 2-12

