Page 21 - กลุ่ม 6 ทำอีบุ๊ค

Table 4: Summary of the number of organizations in each participating province that passed
and failed to meet the assessment criterion of the A performance level.

No. Province Total number of Passing Failing
organizations number of % number of %

organizations organizations
6.1 Nakhonsawan 144 132 91.67% 12 8.33%

6.2 Uthaitani 65 36 55.38% 29 44.62%

6.3 Phetchaboon 129 70 54.27% 59 45.73%
6.4 Pichit 103 57 55.34% 46 44.66%

6.5 Kampaengpetch 91 41 45.06% 50 54.94%

6.6 Sukothai 92 36 39.13% 56 60.87%
6.7 Tak 70 26 37.14% 44 62.86%

6.8 Phitsanulok 104 33 31.73% 71 68.27%
6.9 Uttaradit 81 28 34.57% 53 65.43%

Recommendations for developing and increasing the integrity and transparency in the target
organizations

Based on the collected results of the assessment, some recommendations for developing
and raising the bar of the integrity and transparency in the provincial offices and local administra-
tive organizations in Group 6 were made as follows:

1 . Recommendations based on the Assessment Tools
As previously described, there were three types of assessment tools. Recommendations

to increase the integrity and transparency based on each tool are provided below.
1) Internal Integrity and Transparency Assessment (IIT)
In the IIT, the ITA scores of the assessed organizations in all provinces in Group 6 were at

the very good performance level. As mentioned above, their average score was as high as 89.88.
However, there is room for improvement, and to achieve a higher rating score in the future, the

assessed organizations should:
1) Provide an equal level of services and customer experience, regardless of any
personal relationship between the organization’s officers and its customers.

2) Develop public awareness of a code of law regarding an annual expenditure
budget of the organizations.

3) Allow personnel to participate in a budget audit of their organization.

ถ