Page 109 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 109

CHAPTER 12: Rapid Response Teams  77


                                                                           Traditional code teams are activated when a patient suffers a cardiac
                       children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England
                       and Wales: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376:698-704.  arrest manifesting as a loss of circulation or respiration. In this chapter,
                                                                          we discuss the concept of the Rapid Response Team (RRT), which is
                        • Raspé C, Rückert F, Metz D, et al. Inter-hospital transfer of   activated when a patient develops less severe and earlier signs of insta-
                       ECMO-assisted patients with a portable miniaturized ECMO   bility. We also describe the Rapid Response System (RRS), which is the
                       device: 4 years of experience. Perfusion. 2014; epub ahead PMID   entire system used to support the team.
                       24743549.
                        • Singh JM, Macdonald RD, Ahghari M. Critical events during land-  SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS ARE COMMON
                       based interfacility transport. Ann Emerg Med. 2014; epub ahead
                       PMID 24412668.                                     IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS
                        • Stewart  AM,  McNay  R,  Thomas  R, Mitchell  AR.  Early  aero-  Modern hospitals in developed countries care for patients of increas-
                                                                                                 1
                       medical  transfer  after  acute  coronary  syndromes.  Emerg Med J.   ing age, acuity, and complexity.  Studies conducted in North America,
                       2011;28:325-327.                                   Australia, New  Zealand,  and  the  United  Kingdom suggest that  such
                        • Warren J, Fromm RE, Orr RA, Rotello LC, Horst HM. American   patients suffer adverse events in up to 20% of cases depending on the
                       College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for the inter- and   definition used and population assessed (Table 12-1).
                                                                                         2
                       intrahospital  transport  of  critically  ill  patients.  Crit  Care Med.   In 1964, Schimmel  reported on the incidence of adverse events in a
                      2004;32:256-262.                                    cohort of 1014 patients admitted over an 8-month period to a univer-
                                                                          sity teaching hospital in the United States. Participating house officers
                        • Wiegersma JS, Droogh JM, Zijlstra JG, Fokkema J, Ligtenberg JJ.   reported “every noxious response to medical care occurring among their
                      Quality of interhospital transport of the critically ill: impact of a   patients.” The study found that 20% suffered iatrogenic injury, 6.7% of
                      Mobile Intensive Care Unit with a specialized retrieval team. Crit   which were fatal. Subsequently, two large studies, one in New York  and
                                                                                                                          3
                      Care. 2011;15:R75.                                  the other in Utah and Colorado,  estimated a much lower incidence
                                                                                                  4
                                                                          of adverse events of 2.9% to 3.7%. However, both of these studies defined
                                                                          adverse events from a medicolegal perspective in an attempt to estimate
                                                                          the  incidence  of  medical  negligence.  In  a  different  study  assessing  a
                    REFERENCES                                            broader  definition  of  medical  error,  Andrews  and  coworkers   found
                                                                                                                        5
                    Complete references available online at www.mhprofessional.com/hall  a 17.7% incidence of adverse events.
                                                                           Four subsequent studies defined adverse events as “unintended injury
                                                                          or complication resulting from medical management rather than the
                                                                          underlying disease process.” These studies were conducted in multiple
                                                                          countries worldwide including Australia,  New Zealand,  England,
                                                                                                         6
                                                                                                                             8
                                                                                                                     7
                     CHAPTER    Rapid Response Teams                      and Canada  and enrolled more than 25,500 hospitalized patients
                                                                                   9
                                                                          (Table  12-1). These studies reported an incidence of adverse events
                      12        Daryl Jones                               ranging from 7.5%  to 16.6%  and suggested that between 36.9%  and
                                                                                                                         9
                                                                                       9
                                                                                               6
                                                                          51%  were preventable.
                                Rinaldo Bellomo
                                                                             6
                                                                           The above studies assess adverse events from the perspective of
                                                                          iatrogenesis and negligence. Patients may suffer an adverse event that
                                                                          does not fall into these categories. Bellomo and coworkers  conducted
                                                                                                                    10
                     KEY POINTS                                           a 4-month study of serious adverse events (SAEs) in 1125 patients
                                                                          undergoing major surgery (defined as surgery requiring admission for
                        • Patients  admitted  to  modern  hospitals  may  develop  serious   more than 48 hours) at the Austin hospital. A dedicated research coor-
                       adverse events in up to 20% of admissions. In addition, hospital-
                       ized patients can deteriorate unexpectedly due to the development   dinator assessed patient records for the presence of 11 predefined SAEs:
                                                                          acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, acute pulmonary
                       of a new problem.                                  edema, unscheduled tracheostomy, respiratory failure, cardiac arrest,
                        • In a high percentage of cases, deterioration is gradual in onset and   cerebrovascular accident, severe sepsis, acute renal failure, emergency
                       is associated with the development of derangement in the patient’s   ICU admission, and death. The study reported that 16.9% of patients
                       vital signs.                                       suffered postoperative SAEs, and that 7.1% of patients died. Further,
                        • Many hospitals have introduced Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) to   in those older than 75 years who underwent unscheduled surgery, the
                       review deteriorating patients when they develop derangements in   mortality was 20%. 10
                       vital signs that fulfill predefined criteria.
                        • Evidence for the effectiveness of RRTs is conflicting, and the optimal   SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS ARE PRECEDED
                       team composition and thresholds for activation remain undetermined.  BY SIGNS OF INSTABILITY
                                                                          A number of studies have assessed the clinical course and manage-
                                                                          ment of patients in the hours leading up to SAEs and cardiac arrests
                    INTRODUCTION                                          (Table 12-2).  Some  of  these  studies 11,12   have  used  an  expert  panel  to
                                                                          determine whether the cardiac arrest or iatrogenic arrest was avoidable
                    Modern hospitals treat patients with increasingly complex medical con-  and whether it was associated with medical error. Such studies suggest
                    ditions. Despite advances in medical technology and the advent of new   that approximately 60% of cardiac arrests were avoidable. Similarly, an
                    medicines and interventions, many patients admitted to hospitals suffer   assessment of 100 consecutive emergency ICU admissions suggested
                    adverse events. The most studied of these events are unplanned admis-  that 54% of patients received suboptimal care, and that suboptimal care
                    sions to the intensive care unit (ICU), unexpected hospital deaths, and   was associated with increased mortality. 13
                    cardiac arrests. Other studies have shown that such events are preceded   The major limitation of these studies is their retrospective design and
                    by the development of new problems or derangements in vital signs for   lack of objective criteria for assigning preventability. Consistent with
                    several hours, and that the response to these problems by ward staff may   this notion, Hayward and Hofer  reported an analysis of 111 deaths in
                                                                                                 14
                    be suboptimal.                                        7 Veteran hospitals in the United States, which suggested that previous







            Section01.indd   77                                                                                        1/22/2015   9:37:16 AM
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114