Page 1581 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 1581

1408   Part VII  Hematologic Malignancies


          TABLE   Results of Large Randomized Studies Comparing Standard-Dose Therapy With High-Dose Therapy
          86.18
         Authors            Therapy           Number of Patients   CR (%)        EFS (Median Mo)     OS (Median Mo)
         Attal et al        Conventional           100               5 a             18 a               37 a
                            HDT                    100              22               27                 52
         Fermand et al      Conventional            96               —               18.7 a             50.4 b
                            HDT                     94               —               24.3               55.3
         Blade et al        Conventional            83              11 a             34.3 a             66.9 b
                            HDT                     81              30               42.5               67.4
         Child et al        Conventional           200               8.5 a           19.6 a             42.3 a
                            HDT                    201              44               31.6               54.8
         Barlogie et al     Conventional           255              15 b             21 b               53 b
                            HDT                    261              17               25                 58
         a Significant difference.
         b No significant difference.
         CR, Complete remission; EFS, event-free survival; OS, overall survival; HDT, high-dose therapy.



          TABLE   Single Versus Double Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Newly Diagnosed MM
          86.19
         Study             ASCT        Number of Patients  CR (%) a      Median EFS (Mo)             Median OS (Mo)
         Attal et al       Single           199            42 b          25                          48
                                                           p = NS        p = .03                     p = .01
         (IFM94)           Double           200            50 b          30                          58
         Fermand et al     Single            94            42 a          No difference               No difference
                                                           p = NS
         (MAG95)           Double            99            37 a
         Sonneveld et al   Single           148            13            20                          55
                                                           p = .002      p = .02                     p = NS
         (HOVON24)         Double           155            28            22                          50
         Cavo et al        Single           115            35            Significant prolongation of EFS   59
         (Bologna 96)      Double           113            p = NS          with double-SCT           p = NS
                                                           48                                        73
         a CR + minimum residual disease.
         b CR + very good partial response.
         ASCT, Autologous stem cell transplant; CR, complete remission; EFS, event-free survival; IFM, Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome; NS, not significant; OS, overall
         survival; SCT, stem cell transplant.


        of  the  initial  therapy. This  allowed  for  flexibility  in  the  timing  of   transplant, and three of the four studies showed improvement in PFS,
        transplant to suit the patient’s clinical situation and preference.  but only one study showed an improvement in the OS. The French
                                                                         33
           A metaanalysis of primary data obtained from the three French   trial (IFM 94  ) showed the benefit of a second transplant only for
        studies (IFM 90, MAG 90, and MAG 91) showed no difference in   patients not in VGPR or better after the first transplant. In the era
        the OS between standard therapy and HDT arms. Likewise, authors   of novel agents, a VGPR or better can be obtained before transplant,
        of  another  metaanalysis  using  data  culled  from  nine  randomized   and therefore a second transplant is seldom used outside the setting
        clinical trials reported in the literature showed no survival benefit for   of a clinical trial (Table 86.20).
        HDT and stem cell transplant. These data are in direct contrast to   In the era before introduction of novel agents, induction regimen
        the metaanalysis using the Swedish Cancer Registry and SEER data   had only a minimal role because CRs were uncommon (less than 5%)
        with  improvement  in  5-year  relative  survival  ratios  for  younger   with high-dose dexamethasone or VAD chemotherapy. Thus HDT
        patients  primarily  due  to  the  introduction  of  HDT  and  stem  cell   played a critical role in achieving favorable CR and VGPR rates and
        transplant in the 1990s.                              prolonged durability of unmaintained responses. The availability of
           On the presumption that therapy with a single alkylating agent   novel agents has dramatically changed this paradigm. Novel agents
        at MTD may not be adequate for disease eradication, Barlogie pio-  have improved VGPR or better before stem cell transplant, allowing
        neered  a  tandem  transplant  approach  as  part  of  his  total  therapy   for  posttransplant  consolidation  and  maintenance.  Whether  novel
        approach for the treatment of MM in 1989 (Total Therapy 1) and   agents can supplant HDT and stem cell transplant is an important
        reported  promising  results  without  increased  treatment-related   question that has yet to be answered.
        morbidity or mortality. Single HDT resulted in a CR rate well under
        25% in most trials. These investigators tried to improve the results
        by providing a second consecutive high-dose melphalan and stem cell   Induction Therapy With Novel Agents
        transplant (tandem transplant).
           There have been four large randomized clinical trials comparing   Randomized clinical trials have shown that combined thalidomide
        the role of tandem autotransplant against a single episode of HDT   and dexamethasone therapy is equivalent to VAD chemotherapy. The
        and  stem  cell  transplant  (Table  86.19).  All  four  studies  showed   Dutch HOVON 50 trial researchers compared thalidomide during
        improvement in the depth of response (VGPR) following a tandem   the induction phase and as maintenance following HDT and stem
   1576   1577   1578   1579   1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586